Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 02 2014
-
- Nomination The Hotel The Old Inn - Hotel Měšťák in Krumlov, Czech Republic. --High Contrast 22:36, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 04:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residential building Am Heumarkt 13, Vienna --P e z i 19:12, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Sputniktilt 21:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish church, Ilz, Styria, Austria --Dnalor 01 19:06, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Sputniktilt 21:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stadthausturm (at the Prinzipalmarkt), Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 18:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:46, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Christianhede Church, Christianshede Parish, Viborg Diocese, Denmark View from South. --Slaunger 14:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:46, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Assumption Cathedral in the Kremlin in Kolomna, Russia --A.Savin 12:26, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:46, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Thingvallavatn lake with geothermal power station, Iceland by User:Simisa. --Reykholt 10:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support OK --A.Savin 12:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A western honeybee (apis mellifera) on a scabiosa flower (scabiosa columbaria). --Sputniktilt 10:30, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lögberg, Thingvellir, Iceland by User:Tillea. --Reykholt 09:17, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry, I love velvia film but this is not a good scan (or poor processing (maybe too much grain reduction). Good composition though. --ArildV 01:37, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panorama view of the lake Grimsel and Räterichsbodensee in Switzerland. --Alchemist-hp 07:51, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Excellent. Perhaps slightly oversharpened --DXR 09:43, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Morden tube station. Mattbuck 06:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Lack of sharpness or DoF too close, look at the signs. --Sputniktilt 10:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 20166 at Leyburn. Mattbuck 06:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Sputniktilt 10:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dawn on Sète --Christian Ferrer 05:06, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice. --ArildV 01:42, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A trail in Pinet --Christian Ferrer 05:06, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support very good --A.Savin 12:13, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaque Maison Garnier côté rue des Princes. --Agamitsudo 19:25, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Too dark and with two low contrast. --Slaunger 17:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Buildings in Choisie, a small district in Örebro, next to river Svartån. --ArildV 08:13, 29 May 2014 (UTC). Please remove one dust spot in the sky. Otherwise good. --Cayambe 15:26, 29 May 2014 (UTC) Done+small perspective correction. Thank you.--ArildV 19:29, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok to me now. --Cayambe 05:52, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination This is a type of fireworks commonly known as "Chorki" in West Bengal India. --Dey.sandip 07:59, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Myrabella 22:39, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arslanagić bridge, Trebinje, Bosnia and Herzegovina --Poco a poco 07:54, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Dust spots: I see two at the left, and one at the very right --A.Savin 13:37, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Done ~~~~
Support OK. --A.Savin 12:01, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Ferry Mjølner-Fur commuting between Brande, Salling and the island Fur in Denmark --Slaunger 20:44, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Oppose way too soft for me, and the sky is full of artefacts (possibly compression) --A.Savin 13:25, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Surely, you are joking, A.Savin?? If you look at the file page preview the sky appears to have strong artifacts around the flag and elsewhere due to the autosharpening, but not in full resolution. It has been developed from raw with a jpg quality of 98%, and I do not see artifacts at all in full resolution. And way to soft is also a surprising description. If you look at it in full 18 Mpixel resolution, sure there is pixel-by-pixel softness and visible noise and finite DOF, but when you see the photo in its entirety even on a very high resolution monitor it appears sharp and crisp to me. If you could explain to me in more detail where the problems are, I would appreciate that.--Slaunger 22:25, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
I am sorry: I always check pictures at 100%, this one is - looking at it at 100% - simply nowhere near as sharp as I'm used to see on QI's of similar motif; I don't know what's exactly with the sky, but it must be either artefacts or a pretty evil noise; not sure what else I shall explain here? Just feel free to CR it, if you disagree. --A.Savin 22:57, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for explaining. I just wanted to make sure you had not only considered (by accident) the file page preview. I have never send one of my own photos to CR, and I will not do it this time either. So, I accept it, although I do not agree with the assessment. Do I understand you correctly, then when assesing an image in 100% you assess pixel quality independent of the resolution? --Slaunger 23:16, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Slaunger, the articfacts in the sky are really evident, sorry. Not compression, looks more like bad noise reduction. ISO 400 and f22 seems quite strange anyway. I agree with A.Savin's assessment, the image is not a QI. --DXR 09:26, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
You are right. Sorry for the fuzz. Those camera settings are not how they should have been. I had not noticed that. --Slaunger 10:57, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination This Bridge is connecting the island of Krk with the mainland of Croatia --Isiwal 21:21, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Nice composition and light but it looks blurry to me, sorry --Moroder 11:39, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for cmt. Unfortunately an issue of the lens, the 18-105 is not a good choice for the D7100 for wide-angle shots as you can see on many other QI-candidates in this page. But anyway: not every pic has to be a QI --Isiwal 13:15, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Croatian National Theater, Zagreb, Croatia --Poco a poco 16:58, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 21:10, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140201 - BMW vs Deutsche Bank --Pleclown 11:33, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 04:43, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140201 - Cartier vs Ralph Lauren --Pleclown 11:33, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 04:43, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old knight at medieval event Mittelalterlich Phantasie Spectaculum in Wassenberg, Germany, 2014 --Achim Raschka 07:44, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion QI. (Geocoding would be appreciated) --P e z i 21:06, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monk Rectus talking with forest elves at medieval event Mittelalterlich Phantasie Spectaculum in Wassenberg, Germany, 2014 --Achim Raschka 07:44, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion QI. (Geocoding would be appreciated) --P e z i 21:06, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 144010 at Worksop. Mattbuck 06:26, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 04:38, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Northallerton railway station. Mattbuck 21:14, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose 1/3 right is unsharp --Christian Ferrer 05:25, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lakeside, Lake Windermere. Mattbuck 21:14, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:25, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Canoers on Windermere. Mattbuck 21:14, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:25, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination By the Millennium Dome. Mattbuck 21:14, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:21, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ryde Hoverport. Mattbuck 21:14, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:21, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Great Geysir, Iceland -- -Reykholt 19:35, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Please mention the author for images not taken by yourself. --P e z i 09:01, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Not really sharp. --Mattbuck 23:10, 28 May 2014 (UTC)--PS: The author of the picture is Megan McCormick.Reykholt 09:05, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Great Geysir, Iceland -- -Reykholt 19:35, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Please mention the author for images not taken by yourself. --P e z i 09:01, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Not really sharp. --Mattbuck 23:10, 28 May 2014 (UTC)--PS: Author of the picture is Megan McCormick.Reykholt 09:05, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Great Geysir, Iceland-- --Reykholt 11:08, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Please mention the author for images not taken by yourself. --P e z i 09:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Not sharp. Mattbuck 23:10, 28 May 2014 (UTC) --Author of the picture is User:Simisa.Reykholt 09:05, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Hoverfly (Eristalis pertinax) --Charlesjsharp 09:14, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination 1 Churchill Place. Mattbuck 07:59, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion nice mood but color noise in the sky, maybe improvable --Christian Ferrer 05:11, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Done Mattbuck 20:17, 29 May 2014 (UTC) Support always a bit but acceptable IMO --Christian Ferrer 05:15, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 450027 in Portsmouth. Mattbuck 07:59, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion little purple CAs, hard to see (see note) --Christian Ferrer 05:07, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Done Mattbuck 20:17, 29 May 2014 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 05:15, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Elizabeth's Church in Marburg --Hydro 17:25, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Needs perspective correction, both sides leaning in Poco a poco 20:33, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Bit unsharp, perspective issues. Mattbuck 20:46, 24 May 2014 (UTC) - Decline Not done --Mattbuck 22:09, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination St. Elizabeth's Church in Marburg --Hydro 17:25, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Eines von ca. 250 Umgebindehäusern im Museumsdorf Obercunnersdorf. --Nightflyer 22:13, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
CA needs fixing. Mattbuck 19:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Eines von ca. 250 Umgebindehäusern im Museumsdorf Obercunnersdorf. --Nightflyer 22:13, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Eines von ca. 250 Umgebindehäusern im Museumsdorf Obercunnersdorf. --Nightflyer 22:13, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Tilt/perspective issues. Mattbuck 19:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Eines von ca. 250 Umgebindehäusern im Museumsdorf Obercunnersdorf. --Nightflyer 22:13, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Eines von ca. 250 Umgebindehäusern im Museumsdorf Obercunnersdorf. --Nightflyer 22:13, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Tilt/perspective issues. Mattbuck 19:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Eines von ca. 250 Umgebindehäusern im Museumsdorf Obercunnersdorf. --Nightflyer 22:13, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Eines von ca. 250 Umgebindehäusern im Museumsdorf Obercunnersdorf. --Nightflyer 22:13, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Tilt/perspective issues, foliage on left should be painted out. Mattbuck 19:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Eines von ca. 250 Umgebindehäusern im Museumsdorf Obercunnersdorf. --Nightflyer 22:13, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Eines von ca. 250 Umgebindehäusern im Museumsdorf Obercunnersdorf. --Nightflyer 22:13, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Clipping issue at top, possible perspective problems. Mattbuck 19:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Eines von ca. 250 Umgebindehäusern im Museumsdorf Obercunnersdorf. --Nightflyer 22:13, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hôtel de Magnoncourt, in Vesoul --ComputerHotline 07:30, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Perspective issues. Mattbuck 14:33, 24 May 2014 (UTC) - Decline Not done --Mattbuck 22:08, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Hôtel de Magnoncourt, in Vesoul --ComputerHotline 07:30, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parque Costa Azul --The Photographer 05:56, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Tilt/perspective issues. Mattbuck 14:16, 24 May 2014 (UTC) - Decline Not done Mattbuck 22:07, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Parque Costa Azul --The Photographer 05:56, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Consensual review edit
File:MÁV V43 and ZSSK Class 350 in Budapest-Keleti pályaudvar. - 14-05-06-budapest-RalfR-04.jpg edit
- Nomination Budapest Keleti pu. station; Locomotive 431 --Ralf Roletschek 10:56, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. Small DoF, but IMO still QI. --XRay 06:36, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Mostly out of focus. --Mattbuck 21:53, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support Low DOF, but ok --High Contrast 14:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose per Mattbuck and overexposed background, and purple CA top left --Christian Ferrer 15:47, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. I kindly request reviewers to be maybe more careful a little ! We have here a lot of very visible chromatic aberration, not only at top left, but at top right too, a no-go for a QI, IMO. BtW, there is a dead pixel near the step of the front locomotive...--Jebulon 14:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --Jebulon 14:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Militaergeographisches Institut Globus Wien DSC 10171w.jpg edit
- Nomination Former Institute of Military Geography, facade detail, Vienna --P e z i 18:57, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. A bit soft, but difficult shot at 450mm --DXR 19:19, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Oppose for now.Is our poor earth so oval ? A correction is needed, IMO.--Jebulon 20:27, 25 May 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 21:27, 25 May 2014 (UTC) - Support Not perfect, but better. It works for QI. Thanks for correction.--Jebulon 14:27, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Jebulon 14:27, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Orange tip female (Anthocharis cardamines).jpg edit
- Nomination Orange tip female butterfly (Anthocharis cardamines) --Charlesjsharp 21:21, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 12:26, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Blur wingtip, blur head (!), noisy background. --Graphium 17:48, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support Enough for QI. --Archaeodontosaurus 06:53, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Festiwal_Naadam_na_stepie_na_obrzeżach_Ułan_Bator_33.JPG edit
- Nomination Naadam festival on the steppe, on the outskirts of Ulan Bator. Mongolia. Mongolian horses and riders. --Halavar 15:04, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality, LouiXXXII 09:37, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose - noisy, too high contrast. Mattbuck 22:18, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Mattbuck.--Jebulon 14:16, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Jebulon 14:16, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Krajobraz_w_Parku_Narodowym_Gorchi-Tereldż_33.JPG edit
- Nomination Landscape. Gorkhi-Terelj National Park. Mongolia. --Halavar 22:36, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:00, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Yellowish color cast. Looks more natural with white balance taken from bright clouds on the left edge. --Sitacuisses 08:58, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- You again with colours... Can you imagine, that not everywhere colours of landscape and sky looks the same? Especially in the end of the day? I have wrong time in my images from Mongolia, so this image was taken after 6 PM. If you ever have been in Mongolia, then you should know, what are the natural colours in that country. Hope to see your images soon (of course with proper, natural colours) :) --Halavar 17:01, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
SupportOppose White balance problems and yellow channel satured --The Photographer 17:06, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Cayambe 13:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
File:P-konyaeva-2014-2013.jpg edit
- Nomination Festive evening «We inherited the victory» in the «Ganshin manor» museum. --PereslavlFoto 16:14, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --XRay 14:21, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Flash too harsh IMO --Poco a poco 08:56, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support Excellent portrait, which makes that I can live with the flash harshness. --Cayambe 09:07, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose - harsh flash and not particularly sharp. Mattbuck 10:05, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose No problem with the flash light for me, but indeed, it is not sharp enough. Sorry.--Jebulon 14:14, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --Jebulon 14:14, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Clapton-in-Gordano MMB 07 M5.jpg edit
- Nomination The M5 in Clapton-in-Gordano. Mattbuck 06:58, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Graphium 09:41, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Unbalanced composition, large parts lacking sufficient detail. --Sitacuisses 14:51, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- The composition felt balanced to me, the idea of the photo is to have the motorway lit up and the rest only having reflected light. Mattbuck 16:50, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- In a good night shot I'd expect some more detail in the darker parts. The picture's dynamics are concentrated to the right side; the left third is too dark and somehow useless. It would probably look better if the light lines would all start at the horizontal edge, not some of them at the right side and some at the bottom. The image also seems to be tilted, that's my impression confirmed by the arrows on the road signs. The subject is nothing special and easy to replicate; try again with some more daylight left or longer exposure time to get more overall detail. Finally, there are a few hotpixels. --Sitacuisses 05:14, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- The composition felt balanced to me, the idea of the photo is to have the motorway lit up and the rest only having reflected light. Mattbuck 16:50, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support Some noise in the sky (see note). But its ok for me IMHO --The Photographer 17:05, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support Great picture ! Jacek Halicki 09:42, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support The traffic on the street could have been more busy ;-) But all in all a very good photograph. --High Contrast 14:49, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Unfortunately it was May, so the late night necessary for the light didn't lend itself to heavy traffic. Mattbuck 16:30, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --VT98Fan 19:33, 29 May 2014 (UTC)