Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 07 2024

Consensual review

edit

File:African_wolf_(Canis_lupaster)_in_Bouhedma_National_Park.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination African wolf (Canis lupaster) in Bouhedma national park. By User:Faouz Kilani --TOUMOU 21:36, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Chroma noise, lacking sharpness, lacking categorization --Plozessor 04:04, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose It is an interesting place, but it does not have the necessary quality --Parsa 2au 08:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

  Oppose Not sharp al all --Екатерина Борисова 02:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
  Oppose Beautiful landscape, but unfortunately noisy and blurry picture. Not QI, sorry --Екатерина Борисова 00:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
  Oppose Beautiful landscape, but unfortunately noisy and blurry picture. Not QI, sorry --Екатерина Борисова 06:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
  Oppose Something went wrong with voting and all my comments migrated from here to the next picture. I tried to say that this one is unfortunately noisy and blurry. Not QI, sorry --Екатерина Борисова 07:05, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Rather blurry, not QI, IMHO --Екатерина Борисова 02:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
  Oppose

  • Something went really wrong with comments to this and next image. I deeply sorry for so many words here, i didn't want to do it --Екатерина Борисова 03:08, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Unsharp and below the QI-standards. --Milseburg 09:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Milseburg --Plozessor 04:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC) You voted twice. --Milseburg 13:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
    @Milseburg Oops! 😯 --Plozessor 04:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Augustgeyler 19:12, 6 June 2024