Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 18 2024

Consensual review

edit

File:Connel_Bridge_seen_from_the_water.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Connel Bridge in Connel, Scotland, as seen from a boat to the west of the bridge. --Grendelkhan 07:46, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Too dark and perspective correction is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 08:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:41, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Underexposed. --Kallerna 07:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too dark, otherwise overprocessed smartphone picture. Would be borderline even with correct exposure. --Plozessor 08:59, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Done Rotated slightly and increased the gamma to brighten. Please take another look. Grendelkhan 18:22, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Passenger_Experience_Week_2024,_Hamburg_(P1180606).jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Radome on display at the World Travel Catering & Onboard Services Expo 2024 in Hamburg --Celestinesucess 18:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --C messier 19:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The crop of left lower part of the pedestal isn't optimal. --Sebring12Hrs 08:16, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose Per Sebring12Hrs. The resolution indicates that this is a cropped version, maybe the author can fix the crop. --Plozessor 09:01, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose until bottom left crop is fixed (if possible). Otherwise good.--Benjism89 18:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:01, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Lindsjøen_2023_(5).jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Lindsjøen in Norway.--Peulle 08:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --SHB2000 10:35, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Tilted, otherwise ok. --Plozessor 14:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Tilted a lot. --Sebring12Hrs 19:37, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Agreed with the others, the tilt should be corrected. ReneeWrites 22:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support I don't think the photo is actually rotated very much, if it is, then only minimally. Most of the trees in the background are fairly vertical. If I rotate the image just 1° clockwise, most of the trees seem to fall over to the right. In the small preview it actually looks quite slanted, but this is probably an optical effect resulting from the lighting and the course of the opposite bank. --Smial 23:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Apart from the trees which are definitely leaning to the left, the lake's surface is clearly not horizontal. --Plozessor 04:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose. My impression is that the lake is hanging crooked and is in danger of overflowing. -- Spurzem 21:36, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Augustgeyler 15:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

File:At_London_2024_109.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination: Roadworks on Baker Street, London, revealing underground piping. --Mike Peel 07:33, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Comment Quality good but slightly leaning out on both sides! --Scotch Mist 15:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Done Perspective redone, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 21:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Comment Left ok now but right still slightly leaning out! --Scotch Mist 06:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Ah, I used the lamppost on the right, but guess it's not straight. Perspective redone using part of a building, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 07:48, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:25, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, but the sky and some details next to it are burned out. --Augustgeyler 20:51, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Augustgeyler. In addition, the file name is too broad. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:33, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support A very nicely composed, sharp, image of an interesting subject. File name complies with the uploader's usual form of file names. Is the sky (which is in the distant background) really burned out, or is it just a typical overcast London sky? Bahnfrend 08:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Augustgeyler 15:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

File:A830_in_Mallaig_city_center.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination The A830 road as it passes through the city center of Mallaig, Scotland. --Grendelkhan 07:46, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Level of detail too low for me, sorry --PantheraLeo1359531 07:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Disagree, I think it's fine. Let's discuss this. ReneeWrites 14:22, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
  • I don't follow, please explain. It's in focus and well exposed at around 12 MP; what kind of detail do you mean? --Grendelkhan 14:28, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Detail seems fine for me. --MB-one 20:39, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose   Level of detail too low. Just so much mobile phone processing made any texture disappear. --Augustgeyler 08:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Comment There are at least fifty other QI taken with this phone model; I don't think that the processing is generally held to be a problem. See https://w.wiki/AK7R. Grendelkhan 11:11, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Comment I disagree. The quality in this images sometimes show way less detail than a 12 years old DSLR would provide. In some scenarios with bright light nad good contrast the results might be OK. But in some other situations, like here, the over processing really makes the result too poor to become QI. --Augustgeyler 18:48, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Lack of detail, overprocessed. That there are QIs taken with a Pixel XL doesn't make all Pixel XL pictures QIs. --Plozessor 03:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Image is a bit too dark for me, but perhaps that's just because I'm not very familiar with Scotland. Bahnfrend (talk) 08:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Underexposed. --Kallerna 07:45, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Done Brightened a bit. Please have another look. Grendelkhan 20:42, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →   Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:59, 17 June 2024 (UTC)