Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 27 2013

Consensual review

edit

File:Iris 'Buttercup Bower' 02.JPG

edit

 

File:2013.06.04.-25-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim-Kleiner Sonnenroeschen-Blaeuling.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Kleiner Sonnenröschen-Bläuling - Aricia agestis. --Hockei 18:04, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Oppose Disturbing grass in the backgroundforeground covering the subject, sorry --Poco a poco 18:33, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
    You mean the foreground I think. Anyway, I wish to discuss if it is actually distracting so much how do you find. --Hockei 18:47, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
    Yes, I meant foreground Poco a poco 19:26, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
      Oppose Very nice but not very sharp at full resolution. --Christian Ferrer 05:03, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Iifar 11:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC))

File:2013.05.28.-6-Mannheim Vogelstang-Koerbchenspinne-Weibchen.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Körbchenspinne - Agalenatea redii, Weibchen (female). --Hockei 17:36, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose DoF problem and need sharpening --The Photographer 17:45, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
  •   Oppose   Not done Mattbuck 16:46, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
      Done New version uploaded. Hope good enough. --Hockei 18:04, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
  •   Support For me, it is good enough, a qi now. --PJDespa 20:54, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Holleday 18:24, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Several big dust spots (see notes). Lots of colors in the reflections (chromatic noise?). I do not know if the picture would be blurred with 2 megapixels, but now it's blurred IMO--Lmbuga 22:35, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others. Strange processing. --Kadellar 23:00, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Iifar 11:24, 27 June 2013 (UTC))

File:Panorama_Schloss_Suresnes.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Panorama of the Castle Suresnes in Munich. It is now a part of the catholic academy in bavaria. View from the academy side. It was made with Autostitch out of 2 pictures (Katholische Akademie Bayern - Schloss 003 to 004). --Mummelgrummel 14:19, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Cayambe 19:54, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
  •   Oppose   Comment Stitching "ghosts" of branches on the sky, lack of fine detail. --Iifar 05:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
  Comment Nice but not sharp at full resolution --Christian Ferrer 05:174, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
  Done I loaded up a new version stitched with Hugin. --Mummelgrummel 09:57, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
OK, it's much better but it need perspective corrections, the left and the right windows are leaning outer --Christian Ferrer 16:18, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
  Done Last attempt with an adjusted perspective. Thank you for commenting. --Mummelgrummel 17:33, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
  •   Support : QI for me now. --JLPC 17:46, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
  •   Support : And me too. --Christian Ferrer 20:28, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Iifar 11:23, 27 June 2013 (UTC))

File:Stained_glass_window_in_Basilica_of_Our_Lady_of_the_Valley_09.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Stained glass window --The Photographer 17:18, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • See notes with CA and perspective distortion, Poco a poco 22:44, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
  •   Done --The Photographer 21:56, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Much better, but it needs a final touch (left side, right side is perfect) Poco a poco 18:18, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - Fan spoils it for me. Mattbuck 19:11, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Me too. --Ikar.us 21:55, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Iifar 11:22, 27 June 2013 (UTC))

File:Basilica_of_Our_Lady_of_the_Valley.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Basilica of Our Lady of the Valley --The Photographer 17:18, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline   Comment Towers are leaning to the left and left side of the sky looks rather unnatural. --Iifar 17:33, 8 June 2013 (UTC)  Done --The Photographer 18:59, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
      Oppose Blurry --Christian Ferrer 21:28, 14 June 2013 (UTC)   Comment I dont think so --The Photographer 13:32, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
      Comment There is an unsharp and blurry zone at the third window --Christian Ferrer 14:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
  •   Comment - I find the wall being vertical on the left but leaning in on the right to be disturbing. Mattbuck 17:46, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --Iifar 11:21, 27 June 2013 (UTC))

File:Life Ball 2013 - opening show 140 Karolína Kurková.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Karolína Kurková at Life Ball 2013 --Tsui 11:38, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Blurry --Poco a poco 19:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
  •   Support Ok with regard to the shooting conditions. --Tuxyso 09:06, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - face is ok, but the feet are very low quality. Mattbuck 23:21, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
  •   Oppose wrong settings imo. --Kadellar 22:54, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Iifar 11:21, 27 June 2013 (UTC))

File:Finger_Hof_Völser_Aicha.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Farmhouse Finger in Völser Aicha --Moroder 18:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Comment IMO it need perspective correction, but impossible without big crop --Christian Ferrer 17:15, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
     :   Comment I made it a choice to not correct the perspective on buildings taken from a level below their lowest point as it happens for farmhouses on steep slopes very frequently here in ST. I think this is shared by many reviewers. Thanks for your review.--Moroder 10:04, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
      Support For me it is an IQ, the house is on a steep slope, taken from an inferior place, more perspective correction seems unnaturally --Haneburger 06:05, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
  • For information the purpose of a good correction is to seem more naturally --Christian Ferrer 17:27, 14 June 2013 (UTC)


  Support but only without more distortion. --Ralf Roletschek 07:29, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

  • For information a good correction is less distortion of the subject --Christian Ferrer 17:27, 14 June 2013 (UTC)


  Oppose Only bad correction look unnaturally, please take a look at a test I have uploaded on the file page, IMO it is possible to correct naturally but not with your centring, it need too biggest crop --Christian Ferrer 11:06, 12 June 2013 (UTC)   Comment Sorry, I don't get your point. Tu peut ecrire en francais s.v.pl? --Moroder 17:34, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
  Comment Je pense que ce genre de photo est corrigeable (pas celle -la en particulier), j'ai d'ailleurs fait un test que j'ai téléchargé, tu peux y acceder en regardant les différentes versions de ton image, j'ai nettement l'impression que ma version est plus naturelle que la tienne, seul problème : les frames grises, avec un angle plus grand l'image aurait été aisément corrigeable, qu'elle soit dans une pente ou pas, amicalement --Christian Ferrer 18:27, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

  • Merci bien --Moroder 16:22, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Iifar 11:19, 27 June 2013 (UTC))

File:A doe sitting in the grass.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination A doe in a pasture. --PJDespa 21:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Moonik 04:56, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Noisy, not id'ed. Please also ad geo-coding. Biopics 22:52, 10 June 2013 (UTC) :  Done noise reduction and geo-coding --PJDespa 09:21, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
  •   Support QI to me Poco a poco 08:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
  •   Oppose due to JPEG artifacts. Mattbuck 17:49, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
    Oh, also bad name, please change ..jpg to .jpg. Mattbuck 17:55, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
  •   Oppose As others: Not ided and... noise or jpg artifacts--Lmbuga 22:09, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Iifar 11:18, 27 June 2013 (UTC))