Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 05 2016

Consensual review

edit

File:Sankt-Heinrich-door-Bamberg-P2137513PS.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Door of the side entrance of the Catholic Church of St. Henry in Bamberg --Ermell 08:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment This has too much noise for me. A static subject like this does not need to be shot at ISO 800. --Rftblr 10:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
      Comment   Done
    Wat´s wrong with 1/80 sek. and f/3,2 using 800 ISO?--Ermell 23:09, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
    •   Comment The noise is reduced, but since I am very critical in this respect, another Wikimedian should decide if this is acceptable. As for what's wrong: a tripod, a monopod, or the very good IBIS of your camera body would have made ISO 100 or ISO 200 possible. --Rftblr 09:11, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose The rework appears blurry and oversharpened with loss of detail now, most surfaces look like plastics. Overprocessed. Despite the rather slight noise the first version is much better. --Smial 11:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
    •   Done
      Final version uploaded.--Ermell 22:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
      other opinions? --Ermell 22:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support I think, version 3 is an acceptable compromise. Noise can still be found by pixelpeeping, but is not disturbing at 100% view. Change vote to support. -- Smial 09:44, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 09:41, 4 March 2016 (UTC)