Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 11 2017

Consensual review edit

File:Poppy anemone 05.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination A Poppy anemone (Anemone coronaria) at Beit Guvrin National Park. --SuperJew 21:38, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support The DoF could have been a bit deeper, but most of the flower seems sharp enough. --Peulle 22:53, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, but the harsh contrast betwenn the shadows and the washed-out highlights ruin the picture for me. --A.Savin 14:15, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - I basically agree with A.Savin: The blown-out highlights are too distracting, although the flower itself is OK. -- Ikan Kekek 16:33, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others --Uoaei1 07:11, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others. Daniel Case 07:34, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --A.Savin 03:16, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Tunisian_Musicians_05.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination This is an image of music and dance from --Hamed Gamaoun 16:38, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality --Llez 18:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too tight left crop, IMO, sorry.--Peulle 00:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - I have to agree. I don't like the right crop, either. This is a nice photo for an album, but I think it needs to show at least the entire instrument at least to be a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 10:47, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Good portrait of the musician.--Ermell 21:34, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose This left crop is a no-go. --C messier 13:30, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle (talk) 15:22, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Hannover Pferdegiebel.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Gable with crossed horse heads in the Historisches Museum Hanover.--Palauenc05 21:19, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Maybe it's the wood but it looks unsharp; lighting also seems to have inconsistent effects and without the .EXIF data we can't tell whether that was avoidable or not --Daniel Case 19:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
  • New version uploaded. Please look again. --Palauenc05 07:22, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Question Is that chroma noise on the green area? Do you think you could enhance it a bit? --Basotxerri 16:26, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Which green area do you mean? Actually, lighting in that museum was quite difficult. --Palauenc05 08:42, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
  Comment I've left you a note. Anyway, it's good enough for me, but if you can get it better, please try. --Basotxerri 17:01, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Basotxerri 17:01, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your advice. I'll try it later. --Palauenc05 18:15, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Done Noise removed. --Palauenc05 11:35, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks ok to me. --W.carter 20:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 03:15, 11 March 2017 (UTC)