Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 26 2023

Consensual review edit

File:Chambre_de_la_Favorite,_Bardo,_Alger.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Room of the "favorite" inside the Bardo National Museum, Algiers, Algeria --Reda Kerbouche 08:14, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose need more light i guess --Modern primat 13:26, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support I suppose that's how much light there was, and I think it's OK. -- Ikan Kekek 23:17, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Weak support I am more concerned with the level of detail, but good enough IMO --LexKurochkin 08:02, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 09:59, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Bramois_depuis_ses_vignobles.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Le village de Bramois depuis ses vignobles en mars 2022. --Espandero 18:00, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:32, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Good quality, but needs a rotation or perspective correction, buildings on the left are leaning out --Mike Peel 21:37, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
    @Mike Peel: you are right. I uploaded a new version. I had to make a new panorama, which allowed me to expand the view a little bit on the right. I hope this solves the issue. Thanks, Espandero (talk) 17:18, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
      •   Support @Espandero: The new version looks much better, thanks! Maybe a little dark. But good quality. Maybe worth a try for Featured? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:01, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Excellent sharpness, nice slice of life. -- Ikan Kekek 23:47, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Very good quality. --LexKurochkin 12:35, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 18:40, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Polygonia_c-album_auf_Hagebutte_20221028_03.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Comma (Polygonia c-album) on rose hips --Uoaei1 05:38, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:41, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose butterfly not in focus and very far away --Charlesjsharp 12:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support The shot is sharp enough overall, well exposed, appears to have natural colors, and unlike the usual close-ups, shows the butterfly in natural lighting in a natural setting. Such shots can also be QI, even if they don't show every scale on the wings with over-sharpened details. --Smial 11:24, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support The rose hips are titled, the rose hips are focussed, I don't see a problem with that.--Der Angemeldete 20:59, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Most of the shot is unsharp, but that's artistic license. Enough is sharp, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 23:49, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Der Angemeldete and Ikan Kekek --LexKurochkin 08:04, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 10:00, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Polygonia_c-album_auf_Hagebutte_20221028_04.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Comma (Polygonia c-album) on rose hips --Uoaei1 05:38, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose does not capture butterfly well --Charlesjsharp 12:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
    •   Comment This is not intended to be a close-up of the butterfly. --Uoaei1 13:53, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The overall image quality is just as good as in the photo one above, but in this case the butterfly is difficult to make out due to perspective and lighting, and the depth of field is insufficient. --Smial 11:43, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support The butterfly is viewed from an angle below it. Again, what's sharp and what isn't is artistic license, and I think enough is sharp enough, with the rest being taste. -- Ikan Kekek 23:51, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Augustgeyler 10:00, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Lizard,_Tamale_(P1100336).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Lizard in Tamale, Nortthern Ghana --MB-one 17:02, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. A bit noisy, but the lizard doesn't seem mad about it. --Der Angemeldete 23:29, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose too dark and too far away and not so sharp --Charlesjsharp 12:10, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Charlesjsharp. Noise kills details. --Smial 11:47, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose   Underexposed --Augustgeyler 21:59, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Augustgeyler 10:01, 25 March 2023 (UTC)