Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 28 2016

Consensual review edit

File:ITA_Firenze_Basilica_di_Santa_Croce_2.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: Basilica di Santa Croce, Santa Croce, Centro Storico, Firenze, Italy. By User:Grueslayer --Tkarcher 15:51, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:35, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Needs perspective correction. --C messier 09:54, 17 March 2016 (UTC) Fixed. --C messier 21:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Back to   Oppose after the revert of perspective correction. According to the guidelines, perspective correction should be applied in this case. --C messier 16:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support its ok so, but only without distortion. --Ralf Roletschek 15:36, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment I uploaded a new version with a corrected perspective. Tkarcher 20:27, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose the foreground is too dark for a sunny day --Hubertl 03:45, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
    • The foreground is dark because it is a sunny day. Ram-Man 22:35, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support It was good before, now it is better. Ram-Man 12:17, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose   Support It was good before, now it's unnatural. --Ralf Roletschek 12:55, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Looked better before IMOH. Riley Huntley 22:24, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment @C messier, Ralf Roletschek, and Riley Huntley: Thanks for your feedback. Following the majority of your votes, I reverted the image back to the previous version. Tkarcher 20:27, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose This is quality for you? Sorry but many problems,perspective for first at all--Livioandronico2013 20:20, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
    • At its core, this image is easily correctable for QI purposes. The fact that people are objecting to the corrections means that the QI process is getting in the way of what should be an easy result. So yes, I support it because it's trivial for the end user to do what they want with it. Ram-Man 22:34, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment Ok, now I'm completely confused: Apparently, the bot decided to promote this image tonight for whatever reason. What's the process now? Delete the promotion? Ignore it and wait for the final result?! --Tkarcher 09:02, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 19:03, 27 March 2016 (UTC)