Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 02 2014

Consensual review edit

File:Saqqara pyramid.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Saqqara stepped pyramid --Charlesjsharp 12:23, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Support QI for me --Halavar 14:31, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
    I disagree - there is a big dustspot. --Cccefalon 16:41, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
    thank you for spotting the dust spot. Now gone. --Charlesjsharp 08:20, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
      Support Good then; case can be closed in two days without further waiting IMO. --Cccefalon 10:57, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Cccefalon 05:42, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Byland Abbey MMB 05.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Byland Abbey. Mattbuck 16:15, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Good, maybe slightly tilted, though? --Poco a poco 21:08, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
    It's quite possible it's tilted in reality, probable even. Mattbuck 16:34, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Poor lighting -- Sanyambahga 17:41, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The climate is not conducive to providing a poor light today --The Photographer 12:38, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
    We call that England! Mattbuck 17:14, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment light is acceptable IMO (even a good image for the light) but I'm with Poco it's tilted and/or perspectives --Christian Ferrer 16:20, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The sun comes out in England and improves photographs. I agree with "Poor Lighting" review --Charlesjsharp 08:51, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Cccefalon 04:18, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Muffin,_Ciudad_Ho_Chi_Minh,_Vietnam,_2013-08-14,_DD_01.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Muffin, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam --Poco a poco 03:51, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Maathavan 12:21, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I'd like a discussion about my annotations, please.--Jebulon 15:18, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
    •   New version with selective denoising Poco a poco 21:03, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
    •   Comment Slightly better for the noise, but in comparison, (no offense) I prefer "my" DoF of my crown than "yours" of your cake  --Jebulon 14:39, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
    •   Oppose Noise reduction solved noise problem but We have a DoF problem can't be fixed --The Photographer 12:37, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose As for The Photographer -- Smial 18:52, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Cccefalon 04:15, 2 May 2014 (UTC)