Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 02 2019

Consensual review edit

File:Ka-Na_BBG_New_York_April_2019.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Ka-Na at Sakura Matsuri, Brooklyn. --King of Hearts 03:37, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:00, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - I'm sorry, I don't think her face is sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 04:59, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Ikan Kekek.--Fischer.H 08:05, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose +1.--Peulle 19:29, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose +1.-- Seven Pandas 21:48, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 23:15, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Victoria_equestrian_statue_2019.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Queen Victoria statue, St George's Plateau, Liverpool. --Rodhullandemu 19:57, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Eatcha 20:00, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Please correct me, if this picture is sharp and not blurry. --PtrQs 23:17, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - No, you're right. -- Ikan Kekek 05:20, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per PtrQs.--Fischer.H 08:08, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Very blurry.--Peulle 19:28, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 23:15, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Vihorlatské_vrchy_-_Vihorlat_-_Zemplínska_šírava_003.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination View of Vihorlat, Vihorlatské vrchy and Zemplínska šírava --Milan Bališin 17:50, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose I'm sorry, but the DOF should involve more than just some small waves in the front. --PtrQs 22:09, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment It's not ideal. But the distance of Vihorlat peak is 15 km away from the hotels on the shore. --Milan Bališin 16:58, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - Maybe it is not possible to focus on the far shore, but then maybe it's not possible to get a QI of this view. -- Ikan Kekek 05:34, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose insufficient quality --Fischer.H 08:14, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 23:12, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Ananuri_castle_and_double_rainbow.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Double rainbow over Ananuri castle, Georgia.--Melberg 16:53, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   OpposeCastle is for me sharp enough for QI, but background is not well done (noisy, blurred and not sharp enough) --Michielverbeek 17:07, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree. The castle is fine. Under the given weather conditions (haze, high humidity) the background is ok. --Zinnmann 17:15, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support per Zinnmann. Not so great at full size, but at 300% of my 13-inch laptop screen, I find the background and the castle acceptable. -- Ikan Kekek 06:24, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose unsharpness and CAs.--Fischer.H 15:11, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Neutral IMHO the sharpness of the castle (which is the main subject) is sufficient, Zinnmann and Ikan are completely right, but Fischer.H is right about the CAs, they should be removed. --Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Unsharp and far from QI. --Arabsalam 20:12, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 23:11, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Kinheim_BW_2018-08-05_14-04-04.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Germany, Kinheim, Burgstraße 10a --Berthold Werner 08:30, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality. --XRay 08:45, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I'm sorry, but in preview size I see a disturbing white (HDR-)rim around the roofs and in higher resolution that is added by unsharpness and CAs. In this version not a QI for me. --PtrQs 21:52, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - Get rid of the halos. -- Ikan Kekek 06:26, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Ikan Kekek.--Fischer.H 15:14, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Overprocessing even visible in thumb size. --Smial 20:15, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 23:11, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

File:2019_Zajazd_Pod_Złotym_Lwem_w_Bardzie_6.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Pod Złotym Lwem inn in Bardo --Jacek Halicki 06:17, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality. Car disturbs the compostion and identic position and perspective like the nominated pictures of 25. and 24. April --Arabsalam 07:01, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree. Good quality for me. --Tournasol7 14:03, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support OK for me. The car is unlucky, but this is QI, not FP. --Aristeas 10:02, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality photo for me too. --Acabashi 13:47, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support - The whole car is OK with me; the bit of a car at the lower right is not. But it's such a small part of the picture that I won't penalize it. -- Ikan Kekek 05:38, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment ISO 100 instead of ISO 400 certainly better recording.--Fischer.H 08:23, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 23:10, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

File:University of Oxford Clarendon Building.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The Clarendon Building in the University of Oxford, England --Mdbeckwith 17:11, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Comment For a direct front view it appears to be tilted CW. Would be better if the top line of the building was parallel to the top of the picture. --Acabashi 17:55, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Chenspec 19:52, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Now sent to discuss per my comment above, plus, the left hand side of the building is higher than the right hand side, and there are CAs around the statues on the left and right. Also the gradated sky looks artificially manufactured. --Acabashi 08:40, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment - Please spell "university" correctly in your filename. -- Ikan Kekek 06:51, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose tilted and spelled wrong. Seven Pandas 11:50, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Acabashi.--Fischer.H 08:34, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 23:09, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

File:2019_Zajazd_Pod_Złotym_Lwem_w_Bardzie_7.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Pod Złotym Lwem inn in Bardo 1 --Jacek Halicki 06:30, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:52, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree too many cars and exact the same perspective as the two nominated pics from yesterday --Arabsalam 08:07, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment @Arabsalam: Note the Commons:Image guidelines: "There is no restriction on the number of similar quality images" for QI. But @Jacek Halicki: the car in front of the door is disturbing and while looking into the category I see, that you´ve made better shots of these subject that day. What is the sense of uploading and nominating all similar images you made? The best would have been enough. --Milseburg 10:10, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Can only go by this photo, which I suppose cannot be discounted because others of similar subject are uploaded. So good quality and OK. --Acabashi 12:07, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - I again find the whole cars OK and the part of a car at the right a bit bothersome. But overall, a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 05:53, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 23:08, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

File:2019_Zajazd_Pod_Złotym_Lwem_w_Bardzie_8.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Pod Złotym Lwem inn in Bardo 2 --Jacek Halicki 06:30, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:29, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree I disagree, exact the same perspective as the two nominated pics from yesterday --Arabsalam 08:10, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose It's slightly tilted CW --MB-one 08:56, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
@MB-one: Tilt is fixed. --Jacek Halicki 07:37, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Fixed tilt and OK now. --Acabashi 12:03, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - I like this better than the views with cars. -- Ikan Kekek 06:05, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment--why three shots of a motive? a good picture is enough.Fischer.H 16:07, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 23:08, 1 May 2019 (UTC)