Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 04 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Songeons Vue de la MFR.JPG edit

 

File:San_Gregorio_al_Celio_(Rome)_-_interior.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination San Gregorio al Celio (Rome) - interior --Livioandronico2013 18:13, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose too hard shadows and partly not sharp, sorry --Denkmalhelfer 15:41, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment   Where? --Livioandronico2013 20:27, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Hubertl 21:12, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 07:48, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 01:50, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Liebfrauenkirche_Säben_Marienkapelle.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Chapel in the Our Lady church in the Säben Abbey in South Tyrol --Moroder 04:38, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • {{o}}   Neutral The quality is ok, but your photobag and your own jacket is distracting. Sorry, You should take care of such details. Changed to Neutral, my decision was maybe to rigid. --Hubertl 08:23, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment I disagree. Sorry Hubertl, what's wrong with a more "personal" rendering? I don't buy that --Moroder 22:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support ok photobag not nice but not an issue to decline, quality looks ok. --Denkmalhelfer 15:55, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment see note Moroder please --Livioandronico2013 20:36, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
    •   Done Thanks Livioandronico2013, but now the grate is less horizontal but walls are more reliable structures ;-) --Moroder 13:30, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 01:48, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Dülmen,_Hausdülmen,_Ehrenfriedhof_--_2015_--_5403.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Cemetery in honor Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:07, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality. Mostly out of focus, sorry --Moroder 07:45, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support IMO, the choise of a shallow DOF is deliberate and as long as the placque is all in focus, it is acceptable. Please discuss. --C messier 13:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Code 20:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support as others --Christian Ferrer 16:58, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 14:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 07:50, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 06:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)