Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 07 2021

Consensual review edit

File:Roter_Klinkerbau_der_Dreieinigkeitskirche_Hof_20210425_DSC08814.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Red clinker building in Hof. --PantheraLeo1359531 15:55, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Oppose Cropped church tip. --F. Riedelio 06:36, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
    I frankly disagree, since the focus is on the clinker building. Is it better when I crop the upper part down to the building? --PantheraLeo1359531 15:07, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose Per F. Riedelio. Could you include the building along with its upper part (+ cross)? --Nefronus 05:09, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   I withdraw my nomination Unfortunately not, I think I will take a new photo next time, thank you for the hints :) --PantheraLeo1359531 17:24, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --A.Savin 23:16, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Feral_pigeon_in_Locarno_2.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Feral pigeon --Commonists 11:24, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Poor process with sharpening artefacts (as usual), dust spots everywhere visible even in preview, out of scope, missing location and poor categories (as usual) (Some of these issues are fixable, some are not.). --A.Savin 12:54, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Done (As usual) :) --Commonists 13:03, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Question What exactly is done? --A.Savin 13:08, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose As Savin--Lmbuga 19:58, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others. Which photoshop filter is responsible for these desasters? --Smial 16:46, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --A.Savin 23:14, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Warley_(Robert_Alexander)_grave,_Allerton_Cemetery.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Grave and memorial to Major Robert Alexander Warley, Denbighshire Hussars. Died October 19th 1917 in Southampton aged 35. In section CH8. --Rodhullandemu 15:35, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   OpposeLeaves are disturbing IMO--Lmbuga 17:49, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
  Comment You seriously expect me to vandalise a tree? It's part of the scene. Rodhullandemu 18:10, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
  Comment Sorry, it's only my opinion. You can upload the picture, but it's not QI IMO --Lmbuga 14:56, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support QI for me. --Tournasol7 19:44, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality, and I think the foliage coming out of the right point of the cross is an interesting form. -- Ikan Kekek 21:30, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Incorrect object location. --F. Riedelio 06:41, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
  Comment@F. Riedelio: You'll forgive me, I hope, for thinking that opposing for a minor typo seems unnecessarily picky. Now fixed. Rodhullandemu 07:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Now QI for me. --F. Riedelio 06:49, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 23:13, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Peking_Große_Halle_des_Volkes_bei_Nacht-20110102-RM-211219.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Great Hall of the People by Night --Ermell 06:41, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. Please complete the file description --Moroder 03:07, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I'm afraid the fringes are way to prominent. Please discuss. --C messier 20:46, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
    •   Comment I'm not seeing the fringes. Where are they, C messier? -- Ikan Kekek 07:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
      •   Comment Around the lights at the top (this lens also produces comae when fully open). --C messier 09:17, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Thanks. No big deal in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 21:22, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support For me, trees are not a problem. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:11, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 23:12, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Rotfuchs_P1180313.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Junger Rotfuchs in freier Wildbahn, Kleinfischlingen in der Südpfalz, Deutschland. --Fischer.H 17:41, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. If you can specify the location a little more, do. -- Ikan Kekek 18:11, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Yes, the picture is descriptive, but the fox itself is noisy, in shadow and the picture has a slight green/blue tint. Let’s discuss. --Nefronus 19:24, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment It improves fixing WB --Moroder 08:09, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
    •   Done
      •   Comment Both versions look the same to me and they have the exact same filesize. --Nefronus 10:03, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Unfortunate location. Noisy. Poor detail in my opinion. --Lmbuga 15:22, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Done --Fischer.H 08:53, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --A.Savin 23:12, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Speyer_Stuhlbrudergasse_5_008_2021_02_26.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Former Jesuit hostel in Speyer
    --F. Riedelio 07:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Third image of the same object; wall is too large. --Jacquesverlaeken 08:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
    I disagree:
    - What does the number of photos (different views) have to do with their quality?
    - The wall is part of the cultural monument.
    --F. Riedelio 08:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree too. Good quality for me. Despite it's leaning on at left a bit. --Sebring12Hrs 10:44, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
      New version Thanks for the hint. --F. Riedelio 11:33, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Perfectly good, and if you're bored with looking at this motif, stop looking at it. -- Ikan Kekek 18:19, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Ikan --Moroder 08:13, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment Why only "just about" six Mpixels from a camera that offers 26? --Smial 11:49, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
@Smial: The image size is a compromise between the requirement in the guidelines (> 2 Mpx) and the minimization of memory and transmission capacity. --F. Riedelio 06:45, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 23:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC)