Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 11 2015

Consensual review

edit

File:El_Grau_Vell,_Puerto_de_Sagunto,_España,_2015-01-04,_DD_71-73_HDR.JPG

edit

 

  • Nomination Grau Vell, SCI Marjal del Moro, Valencia, Spain --Poco a poco 17:31, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:55, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree, foreground looks more as painted --Denkmalhelfer 12:45, 8 May 2015 (UTC) I stroke the vote of a banned sockpuppet out. --Cccefalon 17:40, 10 May 2015 (UTC)


What do you expect from a long exposure with water? Poco a poco 18:21, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

  •   Support From a long exposure with water (under this lighting conditions) I expect exactly this as a result. --Hubertl 23:25, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support For water photography, you take usually either the choice of short exposure (showing single waterdrops, the "frozen moment") or long time exposure, resulting in a effect of flow. Diego choosed - as he did this often before - the long time exposure. Nothing to complain with the water. --Cccefalon 06:43, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice! -- Der Wolf im Wald 08:44, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ralf Roletschek 10:58, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality ! --Billy69150 20:05, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Beautiful. -- Spurzem 21:38, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 08:38, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Південне_Демерджі_на_світанку.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Урочище «Демерджі», м. Алушта, с. Лучисте, Алуштинське л-во, кв. 38. By User:Ya gujinskaya --Ahonc 22:57, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Overprocessed, no realistic colors --Uoaei1 14:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support total disagree, a very good picture --Denkmalhelfer 10:18, 5 May 2015 (UTC) Sockpuppet Poco a poco 19:11, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose see notes. There are so many basic quality problems, including, that there is no english description, that this picture can´t be QI. For educational purpose: see notes! --Hubertl 07:46, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I agree with the notes + a strange dotted line in the bottom --Brucyn 12:27, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --C messier 12:22, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

File:CityJet_British_Aerospace_Avro_146-RJ85_EI-RJC_MUC_2015_01_crop.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination CityJet British Aerospace Avro 146-RJ85. --Julian Herzog 14:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 15:22, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree, some CAs (see image notes). Should be fixable. --MB-one 15:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support I see nothing which must be corrected. -- Spurzem 21:48, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment I see the problem, should be fixed. Thanks for noticing. Julian Herzog 07:08, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Now QI. --MB-one 09:54, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support looks fine --Denkmalhelfer 10:12, 5 May 2015 (UTC) Sockpuppet Poco a poco 19:12, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 12:21, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Large_red_damselfly_(Pyrrhosoma_nymphula)_female_form_typica.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Large red damselfly (Pyrrhosoma nymphula) female form typica, Cumnor Hill, Oxford --Charlesjsharp 08:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose the head and a part of the body is not really sharp, maybe a bit out of focus --Christian Ferrer 20:21, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

* {{o}} indeed not sharp --Denkmalhelfer 10:15, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

  •   Comment Another opinion please? Looks in focus to me. --Charlesjsharp 07:48, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support sharp enough. --MB-one 13:26, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ralf Roletschek 12:46, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support enough for QI --Hubertl 21:27, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

* {{s}} I'll see no issue with this nice picture --Derzno 09:38, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 16:16, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Colza_en_la_cuenca_del_Torote_-_01.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Rapeseed in the Torote basin, in Jarama and Henares basin, Communty of Madrid, Spain. --Kadellar 08:55, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:07, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry The background is blurred, and nothing is sharp in the left side.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:39, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
      Comment Hahaha nice revenge. Buy a better camera and shoot RAW and you won't have any more jpeg artifacts. This is QI, not Flickr. --Kadellar 00:26, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
    11mm on a 60D, at f7.1, gives an hyperfocal of 0.90 m (where it is focused), so everything from 45 cm to infinite is in focus, that should be enough. --Kadellar 02:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
    •   CommentPlease, why would it be sweet revenge? I want to believe that on a 11mm 60D at F7.1 gives a hyperfocal 0.90 m, but at 100 ISO, the photo should be surely more detail ... Check also the sky it seems overexposed... like what a good Canon EOS 60D can give poor pictures as that an Instamatic. A liottle precision: on a DMC-TZ55 LUMIX the High Sensitivity CMOS sensor is 16 megapixels on a Canon EOS 60D is 18 MP (There is no big differences). For information submitted in QI my pictures are corrected with Raw Therapiee 02.04.74. No hard feelings, in future I would submit my photos taken with my Sony α NEX-F3.  --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 08:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose ahhahaha Kadellar is infinite blurred,is simple and easy. Also on flicrk there bad images. --Livioandronico2013 07:50, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Very nice but unsharp. A better exposure solution, maybe? Alvesgaspar 13:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose not sure what should be subject. --Denkmalhelfer 10:16, 5 May 2015 (UTC) Sockpuppet Poco a poco 19:15, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
      Comment Maybe: Rapeseed in the Torote basin, in Jarama and Henares basin, Communty of Madrid, Spain. as the description exactly says? --Hubertl 14:10, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 08:56, 10 May 2015 (UTC)