Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 14 2019

Consensual review edit

File:Iguana_mex_aca_201905_p2.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Iguana iguana, At Acapulco Mexico: --Cvmontuy 05:07, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Comment Looks likr CA at the nose but I guess that is a red heat lamp? --Ermell 06:29, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support I think it's a good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 07:52, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The question should be answered before a pro vote. --Ermell 20:52, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment The sun is the only source of light, the red background is a roof covered with red tyles, i have reduced the ca --Cvmontuy 23:07, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment Thank you. I thought of something like that.--Ermell 07:02, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good qualiy. --Zinnmann 09:40, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good qualiy.--Fischer.H 17:15, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Spurzem 21:42, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
  • @Billy69150: I have told you several times before: in order for the nomination to be closed, you must change "Discuss" to "Promotion" or "Decline". Please do so when executing these decisions in CR.--Peulle 08:38, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Billy69150 13:32, 11 May 2019 (UTC); afterwards done properly by Peulle 08:38, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Wuppertal_Elisenhöhe_2018_054.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Botanischer Garten, Wuppertal --Atamari 08:32, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Quality high enough for QI. However I would crop the woman at the right and a top and bottom crop might also be an improvement --Michielverbeek 09:35, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree: Insufficient file description "Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description." --Moroder 12:16, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support here is no "quality file description" --Ralf Roletschek 07:13, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
  Comment I would like a crop more tight. Perhaps than I could see what the image shows. -- Spurzem 21:46, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
  • @Billy69150: I have told you several times before: in order for the nomination to be closed, you must change "Discuss" to "Promotion" or "Decline". Please do so when executing these decisions in CR.--Peulle 08:37, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Billy69150 13:32, 11 May 2019 (UTC); afterwards done properly by Peulle 08:37, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Sciurus_carolinensis.007_-_Imperial_War_Museum_Gardens.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Sciurus carolinensis (squirrel) in Imperial War Museum Gardens (London). --Drow male 07:02, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Supporthttps://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sciurus_carolinensis.007_-_Imperial_War_Museum_Gardens.jpg Good quality, but I think you should have nominated these pictures much earlier, most of these your pictures are QI as per 2008 standard --Eatcha 13:15, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment - For a few years I only knew the category of Featured pictures. When I discovered the QI, I thought that none of my pictures (or almost none) would have that category. I'm trying to fix it. I'm sorry because I do not know how to edit them, and thank you for your help, honestly, Eatcha. --Drow male 16:09, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I think it's too unsharp for QI in 2019. Also, I think WB is off, it's quite blue --Podzemnik 05:23, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough for me.--Fischer.H 17:24, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Podzemnik --Cvmontuy 11:26, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. -- Piotr Bart 17:47, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 08:36, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Sciurus_carolinensis.009_-_Imperial_War_Museum_Gardens.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Sciurus carolinensis (squirrel) in Imperial War Museum Gardens (London). --Drow male 07:02, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support OK per its time of capture --Eatcha 18:13, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I think it's too unsharp for QI in 2019. Also, I think WB is off, it's quite blue --Podzemnik 05:23, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose because of unsharpness on the face. -- Ikan Kekek 08:05, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Piotr Bart 17:49, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not sharp enough.--Ermell 06:28, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 08:36, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Oliver_Blume,_GIMS_2019,_Le_Grand-Saconnex_(GIMS0172).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Oliver Blume atGeneva International Motor Show 2019, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 12:46, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Unsharp, sorry. --Peulle 18:36, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Not bad. Good composition and the man is sharp enough as I think. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 21:49, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Face is not sharp enough. Bad top crop (through the year 2019 and in this case it would add something to the composition) --Michielverbeek 06:42, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak   Oppose. Sharpness is "good enough" regarding the high resolution and photographic situation. But forehead and nose have clipping in colour channels. --Smial 10:01, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment cropped and pulled down the highlights (no clipping pixels left). --MB-one 19:07, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
  • I still think he's unsharp.--Peulle 10:45, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support, colours now appear natural. --Smial 12:08, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Lacks sharpness.--Ermell 06:27, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Michielverbeek.--Fischer.H 07:38, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 08:35, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Morning_fog_in_Kemeri.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Ķemeri National park --Papuass 09:20, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Syed07 14:27, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree.DOF, too unsharp at the bottom --Milseburg 16:13, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - I'd allow it in spite of the fact that the foreground is the most unsharp area. I still find it beautiful and acceptable at 300% of my 13-inch laptop screen. I don't think it's essential to judge it by looking closely at full size. -- Ikan Kekek 07:46, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too much unsharpness.--Fischer.H 13:34, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Not very sharp but I am supporting it per IKAN -- Eatcha 18:01, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support I would have preferred a smaller aperture with more DOF, too, but IMHO the image is still OK (see Ikan’s statement). --Aristeas 09:17, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
  • @Billy69150: I have told you several times before: in order for the nomination to be closed, you must change "Discuss" to "Promotion" or "Decline". Please do so when executing these decisions in CR.--Peulle 08:34, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Billy69150 13:27, 11 May 2019 (UTC); afterwards done properly by Peulle 08:34, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Columba livia domestica.663 - La Virgen del Camino (Leon).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination A juvenile of Columba livia domestica (pidgeon) in La Virgen del Camino (municipality of Valverde de la Virgen, León, Spain).--Drow male 05:04, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality closeup of the juvenile pigeon's head, but please correct your file description. There is no egg visible in the picture. Also, please note the standard English spelling of "pigeon", no "D". Your photos of young pigeons are interesting. -- Ikan Kekek 06:43, 3 May 2019 (UTC).
      Done--Drow male 06:48, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
      Support - Thank you. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:46, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
      Question - Why is this in CR? If you want to contest the quality of a photo and move it to CR, you should state your objection. Is it possible I messed up this way in two cases? I doubt it. I think someone changed "Promotion" to "Discuss". -- Ikan Kekek 07:47, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
    *  Comment We had a spate of vandalism here yesterday with random, nonsense votes and changes of status to "Discuss". it took me ages to clear up, hence the protection, but some may have slipped through the net. Rodhullandemu 07:49, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
      Comment - I see. Thanks for explaining. -- Ikan Kekek 09:07, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good picture.--Fischer.H 13:37, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I think this one struggles with chroma noise and general detail loss.--Peulle 11:17, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment Drow male, please change the filename, as we are not seeing eggs. -- Ikan Kekek 08:08, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Done --Drow male 20:05, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good picture, and the file name is also good now. --Aristeas 08:30, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Not perfect but QI given the high resolution Poco a poco 08:15, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
  • @Billy69150: I have told you several times before: in order for the nomination to be closed, you must change "Discuss" to "Promotion" or "Decline". Please do so when executing these decisions in CR. Also, make sure you wait until the proper time period after the last vote.--Peulle 08:32, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Billy69150 13:27, 11 May 2019 (UTC); afterwards done properly by --Peulle 08:32, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Ruf_CTR_2017,_GIMS_2019,_Le_Grand-Saconnex_(GIMS1288).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Ruf CTR 2017 at Geneva International Motor Show 2019, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 12:23, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Who said pro?
      Oppose I think it is overexposed and ask to discuss. -- Spurzem 20:17, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
    Weak   Support - Why is this in CR? But since it is, I support. I think the car is only slightly overexposed and OK; the floor to its right is more overexposed. -- Ikan Kekek 07:50, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  Comment We had a spate of vandalism here yesterday with random, nonsense votes and changes of status to "Discuss". it took me ages to clear up, hence the protection, but some may have slipped through the net. Rodhullandemu 07:49, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
@Rodhullandemu: I do not quite understand. Do you want to say that my rating is nonsense? Regards -- Spurzem 20:56, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
@Spurzem: You were not the culprit; someone abusing multiple accounts voted after you. Rodhullandemu 22:53, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Overexposed with colour channel clipping in bright areas. --Smial 14:42, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment redid the levels. Thanks for the comments. --MB-one 19:23, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
  Comment Vote deleted --Smial 13:00, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good now! First vote deleted. -- Spurzem 07:31, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
  • @Billy69150: I have told you several times before: in order for the nomination to be closed, you must change "Discuss" to "Promotion" or "Decline". Please do so when executing these decisions in CR.--Peulle 08:31, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Billy69150 13:26, 11 May 2019 (UTC); afterwards done properly by --Peulle 08:31, 13 May 2019 (UTC)