Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 18 2023

Consensual review edit

File:Ammu_Mahouts_Theppakadu_Sep22_A7C_02897.jpg edit

 

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Decline?   --Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:33, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open_wing_Basking_of_Papilio_crino_(Fabricius,_1793)_-_Common_Banded_Peacock_(3)_WLB.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Open wing Basking of Papilio crino (Fabricius, 1793) - Common Banded Peacock (3) WLB --Anitava Roy 16:54, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment upsclaed
  •   Info the previous comment was not signed, so I made it just comment, not a vote. --LexKurochkin 07:53, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, I can't tell in this photo what is image noise in the wings and what is real information. The background has been extremely denoised, but still has artifacts that are more noticeable around the edges of the wings and also around the body of the animal. The photo may be valuable, but is not QI in my eyes. --Smial 10:20, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Black spots all over the picture frame. -- Ikan Kekek 20:28, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Augustgeyler 20:32, 17 May 2023 (UTC)