Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 20 2018

Consensual review edit

File:Irisbus_Citelis_12_n°262_TCAT_-_Saint_Germain_Courcelles.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Bus in Troyes --Billy69150 11:48, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
    Needs some perspective correction, the posts on the right are leaning, it would probably make the bus appear more straight. --Trougnouf 13:18, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
    I fixed the perspective, can you unwithdraw it? It's a pretty easy process, there are free software such as darktable that automatize most of the work, I highly recommend looking into it. --Trougnouf 19:48, 14 May 2018 (UTC) Oh great, thanks Trougnouf ! I will use darktable now --Billy69150 09:03, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion I'm not sure I can promote an image I edited so I'll   Support and move to discussion just in case. --Trougnouf 20:22, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough. --Smial 09:33, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Ikan Kekek 10:00, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Basotxerri 17:42, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Morské_oko_(v_máji)_006.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Morské oko --Milan Bališin 19:32, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --XRay 10:54, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Blown details. --Yerpo 07:02, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Difficult lighting conditions but the highlights are blown. --Basotxerri 19:41, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support. I don't like blown areas in photos, but I believe it's tolerable in this case, as they are rather small, and there is no colour shift, as often seen in overexposed clouds and/or sky. --Smial 09:38, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support per Smial. You're talking about the tree on the right, correct? Yeah, the highlights could be dialed back a bit, but I don't think they ruin the photo. That said, Milan Bališin, you could make things easy by simply dialing down those highlights a little, and it could improve the picture. -- Ikan Kekek 17:11, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Basotxerri 17:42, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Colored_by_the_buckwheats.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The village of Chusang in Upper Mustang. By User:Ummidnp --Bijay chaurasia 08:14, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Heavy distortion. Correction needed.--Peulle 10:11, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support This is not "distorted", this was shot with the Nikon 16mm Fisheye. It's a great photo. --Granada 10:25, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Buildings on both sides are leaning in; I want more info on this.--Peulle 11:24, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
  CommentIt get's worse: I did not notice until now that this is a second nomination within two days of the very same image. What now? Delete this nomination and send the other to CR? btw: that's the nature of using a fish eye lens. :) --Granada 11:30, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
<comments from the other nomination>
  •   OpposeInsufficient quality. Looks overprocessed, not very sharp vignetting? sorry --Moroder 15:03, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment - There are a few small dust spots that should be fixed. Otherwise, it looks like a QI to me. -- Ikan Kekek 05:22, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Info Nominations are fusioned now. --Milseburg 14:46, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support no distortion. --Ralf Roletschek 22:29, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Looks unnatural. Missing detail. And many dust spots. --A.Savin 13:13, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
  • @Bijay chaurasia and Ummidnp: Could you remove the dust spots? --Basotxerri 07:35, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
  • @Basotxerri and Ikan Kekek: - Dust spot removed. Please have a look. Thank you --Bijay chaurasia 09:01, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Basotxerri 19:45, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support - The people saying there are missing details are right: This wouldn't be a good photo for comprehensive recognition of crops. But I think it's a QI because the crops are more the foreground for the striking scenery. Even the scenery could be sharper, but the standard at QIC is not that this has to be one of the best photos on the site, only one of acceptable quality. Even if the standard should be good and not merely acceptable quality, I give some latitude for composition and decent (though admittedly not overwhelming) picture size. -- Ikan Kekek 08:41, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support per Ikan --Smial 11:30, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support per Ikan --Billy (talk) 15:37, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support +1 --El Grafo 14:19, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per others (Heavy distortion. Correction needed), sorry. And vignneting, strong vignneting IMO al left side--Lmbuga 12:49, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Promoted   --Basotxerri 17:41, 19 May 2018 (UTC)