Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 23 2021
-
- Nomination Interior of the parish church Saints Peter and Paul apostles, Tarvisio, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Relief of Holy Trinity at the Holy Trinity column on Via IV Novembre, Tarvisio, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Howitzer on Lake Predil with Cima Predil and mountain pass in the background, Tarvisio, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lago del Predil and the serpentine road of the mountain pass, Tarvisio, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaque at the museum of Fort Lake Predil, Tarvisio, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 100 North Tampa building. Tampa, Florida. -- Alvesgaspar 01:10, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alley of plane trees. Park D. Carlos I, Caldas da Rainha, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 00:29, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination German Luge Championships 2021 in Altenberg: Andi Langenhan --Sandro Halank 22:04, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:14, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Women's competition at the German Luge Championships 2021 in Altenberg: Jessica Degenhardt --Sandro Halank 22:04, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:14, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Women's competition at the German Luge Championships 2021 in Altenberg: Julia Taubitz --Sandro Halank 22:04, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:14, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Women's competition at the German Luge Championships 2021 in Altenberg: Anna Berreiter, Julia Taubitz, Jessica Degenhardt --Sandro Halank 22:04, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:14, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grand'Rue in Ribeauvillé, Haut-Rhin, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 19:23, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:42, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at 3 Place de la Sinne in Ribeauvillé, Haut-Rhin, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 19:23, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:41, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Welcome sign on Liverpool Road entring Prescot from the south, highlighting the town's connection with William Shakespeare and as a former cable manufacturing centre. --Rodhullandemu 18:20, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:52, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial image of the Rottweil-Zepfenhan airfield, Germany --Carsten Steger 18:14, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 18:35, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial image of the Schwenningen am Neckar airfield, Germany --Carsten Steger 18:14, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:22, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Windmills in the Chora of Ios, Greece. --C messier 17:21, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 18:19, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blue hour view of the Chora of Ios, Greece. --C messier 17:21, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 18:23, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of wayside cross (1690) in Kehrig, Germany. --Palauenc05 16:52, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 18:21, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Puppy", detail --Señor Aluminio 15:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 16:54, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wall tiles, scallop shells. Cambados, Galicia (Spain) --Lmbuga 14:58, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 18:25, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination a Templar Warrior by João Cutileiro, Portugal. -- Alvesgaspar 14:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Hight QI--Lmbuga 15:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common wood-pigeon in front of a dark backdrop. --Alexis Lours 11:32, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 13:53, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common kingfisher on a branch --Alexis Lours 11:32, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:57, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common kingfisher doing an intimidation display --Alexis Lours 11:32, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 18:16, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Support I would support at FP if you correct NR errors in the background. Might be slightly over-sharpened. --Charlesjsharp 19:51, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Praha-Satalice train station, Czech Republic --Cmelak770 10:43, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --V.Boldychev 11:51, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Neoclassical mansion porch, Rue Royale 100, Lille, France --Velvet 10:30, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --V.Boldychev 11:41, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination White Sea–Baltic Canal --Alexxx1979 10:05, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 10:08, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moscow Canal. Lock №5 --Alexxx1979 10:03, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 10:08, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercedes-Benz EQS at IAA Mobility 2021.--Alexander-93 09:25, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Commonists 11:44, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sheds on the Falkenstein in Donnersdorf --Ermell 09:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Commonists 11:44, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View to the river Regnitz near Pettstadt --Ermell 09:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --V.Boldychev 11:59, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ballast cleaning machine SBR RM 76 UHR in Leipzig–Sellerhausen (1992). By User:Falk2 --Augustgeyler 07:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Distracting branch in the foreground, bad POV. --Kallerna 07:51, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Franeker. Martinikerk. Chandelier above the upper part of the organ.
--Famberhorst 06:58, 20 November 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:09, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Franeker. Martinikerk. Chandelier above the upper part of the organ.
-
- Nomination Building at Büttenstraße 4 in Ansbach, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:55, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:23, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at Büttenstraße 23 in Ansbach, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:55, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:13, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Martin-Luther-Platz in Ansbach, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:55, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:55, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at Martin-Luther-Platz 12 in Ansbach, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:55, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:21, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at Büttenstraße 2 in Ansbach, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:55, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:56, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hortus Haren. Pluteus
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 20 November 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Hortus Haren. Pluteus
-
- Nomination Hortus Haren. Melanoleuca melaleuca
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 20 November 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Hortus Haren. Melanoleuca melaleuca
-
- Nomination Trees at the Oedler pond in the Börnste hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trees in the Börnste hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kettbach in the Börnste hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Game reserve in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:15, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Leaf on the sidewalk at Aaseemarkt in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:15, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle Thurn on Linhart square, Radovljica, Upper Carniola, Slovenia -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:04, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cutout from the facade of castle Thurn on Linhart square #1, Radovljica, Upper Carniola, Slovenia -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:04, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle Thurn and parish manson on Linhart square #1, Radovljica, Upper Carniola, Slovenia -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. (The bright midtones could be darker and 16:9 could reduce the empty part at the bottom.) --XRay 05:05, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Painting of Saint Christopher at the western wall of the parish church Saints Peter and Paul apostles and southeastern defense tower on Unity Square, Tarvisio, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:06, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Griffon vulture (Gyps fulvus) --Alexis Lours 03:09, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:06, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Teatro Degollado, Guadalajara, Mexico. By User:U aurora --Another Believer 00:21, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline It needs a perspective correction and this time it is not possible. IMO, tt is also not a very sharp one --Michielverbeek 07:47, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oliver Markouz, footballplayer of Floridsdorfer AC. --Steindy 00:06, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oliver Markouz, footballplayer of Floridsdorfer AC. --Steindy 00:06, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 22:08, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pero Brnic, assistent coach of Floridsdorfer AC. --Steindy 00:06, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 18:29, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Robert Weinstabl, assistent coach of Floridsdorfer AC. --Steindy 00:06, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 18:29, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Peter Eigl, sport officer of Floridsdorfer AC. --Steindy 00:06, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Commonists 11:44, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Souvenir shop, Óbidos, Portugal --Poco a poco 23:04, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Commonists 11:45, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Handcrafter, Óbidos, Portugal --Poco a poco 23:04, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:57, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House of Cintruénigo, Navarre, Spain --Poco a poco 23:04, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mother church, Alcácer do Sal, Portugal --Poco a poco 23:04, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Catedral de GuadalajaraI. By User:Hector ruiz velasco --Another Believer 14:10, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Perspective correction needed. Noisy sky. Sharpness falloff at the left side. --Johannes Robalotoff 19:52, 19 November 2021 (UTC) Oppose Poor framing in the foreground and right margin -- Alvesgaspar 18:37, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Covered bridges in Strasbourg (Bas-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 11:57, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --V.Boldychev 12:18, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vines on the Falkenstein in Donnersdorf --Ermell 08:49, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 18:29, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mirnes Becirovic, footballplayer of Floridsdorfer AC. --Steindy 00:16, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 22:08, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mario Kröpfl, footballplayer of Floridsdorfer AC. --Steindy 00:04, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 22:08, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination European Robin (Erithacus rubecula) perched --Alexis Lours 00:26, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
The feathers look a little beat up but my guess would be that this is a fledgling male (no red breast yet) and this is his first moult. Is this the case? --GRDN711 05:13, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
I guess this is possible, I'm not really knowledgeable on European Robins --Alexis Lours 12:47, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --GRDN711 05:35, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Vai palm forest, Crete. --C messier 18:26, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Maserati MC20 at Auto Zuerich 2021.--Alexander-93 13:45, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mercedes-Benz EQS 580 4Matic at Auto Zuerich 2021.--Alexander-93 13:45, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV at Auto Zuerich 2021.--Alexander-93 13:45, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Portrait of the owner. Casa Romana, Kos, Greece --Ввласенко 13:27, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Apatura ilia, the lesser purple emperor. Tambov Oblast, Russia. --Alexander Novikov 12:29, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Paris - Bonhams 2013 - Peugeot 908 - 2009 (by Thesupermat) --Sebring12Hrs 11:57, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ruins of Inverlochy Castle, Scotland --Domob 11:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ryazan. Kremlin --Alexxx1979 10:10, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Left side leaning in --Poco a poco 11:39, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Armenia. Noravank Monastery --Alexxx1979 10:07, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Left side leaning in, as well --Poco a poco 11:39, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Tombstone Philipp H. Gutwein (†1833), late classicistic, in the monument zone old cemetery in Haßloch
--F. Riedelio 08:27, 14 November 2021 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Tombstone Philipp H. Gutwein (†1833), late classicistic, in the monument zone old cemetery in Haßloch
-
- Nomination Former Inn "Obernberger See" - the sign above the entrance --Kritzolina 17:25, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Not sharp enough. --C messier 17:36, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall of Kaysersberg, Haut-Rhin, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 16:44, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Cut off that huge white space on the top edge --Jakubhal 16:43, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Done, Tournasol7 06:08, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Support Thanks. Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:47, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle of Neuenstein, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:53, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Unfavorable image composition (disturbing flagpole) and cropping (IMO too much foreground). --F. Riedelio 17:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Done, Tournasol7 06:05, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 08:26, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Salgi Village, Distt. Mandi, HP India. --ADARSHluck 18:20, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Comment Seems overexposed to me (e.g. white walls and the white car in the centre). Is there anything you can do about it? --Domob 18:02, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Not done with in a week, so Oppose --Domob 07:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Consensual review edit
File:Tiburón_azul_(Prionace_glauca),_canal_Fayal-Pico,_islas_Azores,_Portugal,_2020-07-27,_DD_02.jpg edit
- Nomination Blue shark (Prionace glauca), Faial-Pico Channel, Azores Islands, Portugal. --Poco a poco 10:25, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Unsharp & noisy. --Kallerna 09:50, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I disagree --Poco a poco 23:11, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined --Augustgeyler 10:46, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Tiburón_azul_(Prionace_glauca),_canal_Fayal-Pico,_islas_Azores,_Portugal,_2020-07-27,_DD_09.jpg edit
- Nomination Blue shark (Prionace glauca), Faial-Pico Channel, Azores Islands, Portugal. --Poco a poco 10:25, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Usharp & noisy. --Kallerna 09:51, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I disagree --Poco a poco 23:11, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined --Augustgeyler 10:48, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Tiburón_azul_(Prionace_glauca),_canal_Fayal-Pico,_islas_Azores,_Portugal,_2020-07-27,_DD_33.jpg edit
- Nomination Blue shark (Prionace glauca), Faial-Pico Channel, Azores Islands, Portugal. --Poco a poco 10:25, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Usharp & noisy. --Kallerna 09:51, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I disagree --Poco a poco 23:11, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose At least the eyes are not sharp. --Augustgeyler 06:15, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Peulle 08:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Tiburón_azul_(Prionace_glauca),_canal_Fayal-Pico,_islas_Azores,_Portugal,_2020-07-27,_DD_18.jpg edit
- Nomination Blue shark (Prionace glauca), Faial-Pico Channel, Azores Islands, Portugal. --Poco a poco 13:43, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Noisy and undetailed. -- Alvesgaspar 22:10, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Undetailed and noisy? I'm started to get really fed up here. --Poco a poco 23:19, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined --Augustgeyler 10:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Bonnet_Macaque_Eating_Banana.jpg edit
- Nomination Bonnet Macaque Eating Banana --Mydreamsparrow 19:35, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 20:01, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Oppose for now - good photo but needs better categorization than "Monkey" and some location information. -- Ikan Kekek 22:17, 18 November 2021 (UTC)- Support Thanks for taking care of that. -- Ikan Kekek 22:58, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support QI --Sandro Halank 22:11, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 23:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Theodor_Josef_Hubert_Hoffbauer,_Quartier_du_Louvre,_1836.svg edit
- Nomination Plan of the Louvre district in 1836 --Paris 16 08:02, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Too low resolution, sorry. --Tournasol7 09:20, 18 November 2021 (UTC) - It is a vector image. And 512px seems to be the maximum of SVG file in Commons. Resolution of the original file is bigger.--Paris 16 09:38, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support It is vector file. You can choose resolution as you like. --Mike1979 Russia 15:03, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support per Mike1979. Looks good. -- Ikan Kekek 23:00, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 08:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Rekolan_ostoskeskus_in_Rekola,_Vantaa,_Finland,_2021_November.jpg edit
- Nomination Rekolan ostoskeskus (small shopping center) in Rekola, Vantaa --Ximonic 18:55, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Insufficient quality. Poor framing and composition. No QI for me. --Milseburg 13:55, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support OK for me. --King of Hearts 23:29, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Sharp, and framing and composition are OK to me. -- Ikan Kekek 23:02, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Per Ikan -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Looks random to mee. Too much font cut up. --Milseburg 14:24, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 15:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
File:West_side_of_Vakulan_talo_in_Rekola,_Vantaa,_Finland,_2021_November.jpg edit
- Nomination Vakulan talo building in Rekola, Vantaa --Ximonic 18:55, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 23:30, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. Poor framing and composition. No QI for me. --Milseburg 13:55, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support I actually like the composition here, and the subtle lighting is quite nice. --King of Hearts 23:29, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, nice and funny --Velvet 11:11, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Perfectly OK, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 23:04, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The west facade is not completely covered. Why is the upper left corner missing? --Milseburg 14:21, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler (talk) 10:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Lisboa_June_2014-2.jpg edit
- Nomination Jardins da Água (Water Gardens) in the Parque das Nações, Lisboa, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 11:29, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose This may be fine from the artistic point of view but doesn't fulfill the QI guidelines. If the water would be the subject it's too blurry, if the building in the back is the subject, it is mostly not visible behind the water --Poco a poco 18:53, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The subject is the background seen from the running water -- Alvesgaspar 20:42, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I really like the idea and the concept of that image. But Poco a poco is right. If the main subject is the house in the background this should be more sharp and we must see much more of it. --Augustgeyler (talk) 09:25, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment And still, the image of this building is at least as sharp (if not more) than some of the pictures below, gladly on their way to promotion. "Deux poids, deux mesures"? -- Alvesgaspar 13:27, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support I support. I liked the contrast between the static background and the dynamics in the foreground. In my opinion, fountain shots will always stand out from the usual row. Not everything can be written down in manuals, this case was not written. --Andrey Korzun 16:35, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support advanced subjekt, ok for me. --Milseburg 17:42, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support First of all, certainly a QI for me. However, I would have additionally tried two different setting variations. Once a version with aperture setting wider open and very short exposure time (1/2000s or shorter) to "freeze" the water. Focus then on the water. Or alternatively much longer exposure time (1/60s or even longer, you have to try) to bring out the "flow" more clearly. Then with the focus on the buildings. --Smial 11:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
- Oppose Per Poco--Commonists 21:43, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Poco, perhaps you'd like to elaborate on which QI guidelines this photo doesn't fulfill, because I just reread them, and I'm not seeing it. I think this is a perfectly reasonable subject and well enough executed. -- Ikan Kekek 23:12, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- That's what I did above, depending on what the subject here is: 1) unsharp or 2) poor composition because hidden behind elements in the foreground Poco a poco 13:24, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I see. So we simply disagree. This is a view through running water, which I think is a perfectly OK subject, and I don't think it's essential for any part of the photo to be sharper. -- Ikan Kekek 14:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 08:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Bad_Dürkheim_Kirchgasse_14_003_2021_10_10.jpg edit
- Nomination Protestant deanery and parish hall of the palace church in Bad Dürkheim, view from east--F. Riedelio 08:05, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Perspective correction introduces extreme distortion in the building. See on-going discussion in QIC talk page. -- Alvesgaspar 16:03, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 08:45, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support OK for me. --Ermell 23:40, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg 17:43, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 07:17, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support I think that the correction of the perspective in this case is still within the acceptable range. With a classic adjustable view camera or a shift lens, this would also be photographable without electronic image processing. Good sharpness, natural looking colors, no excessive post sharpening, for me a QI. --Smial 11:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support--Commonists 21:42, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Seems acceptable and not extreme to me. -- Ikan Kekek 23:14, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 08:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Marktplatz_14_in_Creussen_(3).jpg edit
- Nomination Gemeindehaus at Marktplatz 14 in Creußen, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:53, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support A bit too dark but good quality. --Ermell 09:17, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree, washed out colours due to poor lighting conditions -- Alvesgaspar 10:56, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support QI for me. -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Very poor lighting and distortion. --Augustgeyler 10:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Doesn't look weirdly distorted to me, lighting conditions were what they were, sharp photo. -- Ikan Kekek 14:47, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support I can't find any distortion. You can't choose the weather, but you can take good photos even in bad weather.--Steindy 19:00, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Very poor lighting. One cannot chose the weather, ben one can chose the good day for a picture.--Jebulon 12:41, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry, sometimes we can't chose the good day for a picture. Whatever I like cloudy sky for take the photos. Tournasol7 06:04, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- No you can't, but not every photo has the "right" to become a QI. It is perfectly reasonable that, when light is not good enough for a clear depiction of a subject, we wait patiently for a better occasion. Please understand that one of the most important goals of our QI galleries is to provide the best possible illustrations of the various subjects. Personal likings are not always compatible with that purpose. Please participate in the on-going discussion about the subject in the talk page of QIC. -- Alvesgaspar 12:20, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- The best possible illustrations are the purposes of COM:VIC (if we're talking about the best thumbnails for use online) or COM:FPC. QIC is not about the best possible photos in any category but about photos of good quality. It seems like you want to redefine QIC to be an alternate form of FPC. -- Ikan Kekek 22:43, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with you in abstract, only our thresholds are very different! -- Alvesgaspar 00:23, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- Our differences seem to be not only in degree but in kind. You appear to believe that it is not possible to shoot a good photo in overcast, dull light. -- Ikan Kekek 18:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- Not exactly so although it is certainly much more difficult to take a good photo with an overcast sky. What I don't accept is that the requirements of a good photo automatically change in an inverse proportion with the difficulty of the shot. We know how such tendency can significantly lower the overall quality of the images, just because people are too lazy to wait for a better opportunity, to look for alternative approaches or to learn how to use the powerful tools of the digital lab. This is particularly annoying when experienced photographers are involved, thus passing the wrong message to the beginners. Also, I have taken good photos with an overcast sky and can't see why other people can't do the same. Sometimes, the difficult conditions even wake up the artist within ourselves and suggest creative solutions. But all of this require time, patience, a bit of humility and hard work. Present time's desire of immediate reward is detrimental to Photography. Finally, as I already said elsewhere, inclusiveness should apply to people, not to photos. -- Alvesgaspar 18:54, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- I disagree about your final point, in that photos in dull light and photos of buildings with cars in front of them shouldn't be automatically rejected. As for the rest, I guess your standards for "good" are much higher than mine when the photo is in gray light. I'm not judging the difficulty of the photo, only the result as I see it. -- Ikan Kekek 08:01, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. --Fischer.H 10:35, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Per others. --Sebring12Hrs 22:30, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor light. --Kallerna 08:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Commonists 14:51, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my support --Augustgeyler(talk) 06:33, 20 November 2021 (UTC)- Disagree @Commonists: Today morning, this discussion was 5 to 5. As this was nine days after starting it, I set the result to Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days. But you did not care. To overwrite this without any comment and adding further votes is no good behaviour. --Augustgeyler (talk) 17:53, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Agree The discussion was open....then?--Commonists 17:58, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- That's the point. By setting such a discussion to result correctly, it is not open any more… --Augustgeyler 18:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Rules are to be followed. Please put back the "inconclusive" outcome (I don't know how to do it) -- Alvesgaspar 22:30, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- OK. --Augustgeyler 06:30, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Augustgeyler don't you dare touch my vote! If you have a problem, ask an administrator, not anyone.Read the rules :"In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.". And if you really want to be precise then Kallena voted at 8.21am on the 19th so the 8 days would have expired at 6.53am (as the rules say, after 8 days, counted from its entry.).Either leave both or delete both. --Commonists 11:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry, I thought been asked to do so by Alvesgaspar. I must have accidentally changed the wrong vote. I am very sorry. Of course I would never do something like this intentionally --Augustgeyler 21:56, 21 November 2021 (UTC).
- No problem Augustgeyler, friends as before.Thank you.--Commonists 13:37, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 06:30, 20 November 2021 (UTC)