Calm downEdit

Hi, you are exploding the Consensual Review section of QIC, with at least 30 entries there motivated by you that will end up in most cases, if not 100%, in the opposite direction of your vote. Are you aware of there ressources needed for that (manual effort to prepare each voting and the reviews of so many people)? I don't remember any user having done something like this before. Please, shift down at least 2 gears, and observe first how a FEW of your reviews and candidates evolve before you review 100 images and collapse our process. Thank you. --Poco a poco (talk) 22:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

@Poco a poco: I tried to follow the guidelines. I am wondering that having someone new is such a big deal for the process. Imagine there would be many more voters, lets say 50 per day: Wouldn't that be wonderful and democratic. But I think you would mind that because your well-ordered process might „collapse“. You are looking for people having your opinion to be part of the review process? Can't believe that. --Augustgeyler (talk) 06:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Ok, I try it in a different way. You obviously don't have the experience to know what is a QI and what isn't. I know the guidelines by heart and you are not following them by any means, so don't affirm that you take the book in the hand, apply the rules and I'm upset about that. That's bullshit. You are declining images that are clear QIs, and I would even spend time to prove it to you, but PLEASE, focus on a few and don't review so many after you see that we have to spend a lot of time to reverse your wrong assessments. Poco a poco (talk) 09:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Dem kann ich mich nur anschließen. Auch ich empfinde die allermeisten von Augustgeylers Bewertungen als Störung. Bilder zum Beispiel abzuwerten, weil in einem Wald der Horizont nicht zu sehen ist oder hinter einem Denkmal ein Baum steht, ist Unsinn oder Böswilligkeit. Das hat nichts mehr damit zu tun, dass die Geschmäcker verschieden sind. Im Übrigen verstehe ich nicht, was es heißt, dass einem Foto die „dynamic range“ fehlt. Bitte nichts für ungut, dass ich das so klar sage. Gruß -- Spurzem (talk) 12:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Spurzem: Unter "low dynamic range" meint er wohl, dass es keine sehr helle oder dunkle Töne gibt, sprich, dass man die Schatten zu sehr aufgehellt hat und die helle Stelle zu sehr abgedunkelt hat, was ich aber bei meinen Bildern nicht bestätigen kann. Poco a poco (talk) 15:23, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
@Poco a poco: Danke. Da erinnere ich mich, dass er ein Foto von einem Portal mit der Begründung ablehnte, dass es keine Schatten hatte. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 20:19, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Ok, da Ihr jetzt schon in der dritten Person von mir redet, meldet ER sich jetzt noch mal: Ich vermisste einen großen Dynamikumfang (also Differenz zwischen helstem und dunkelstem Punkt), wenn ein Bild ihn scheinbar in natura hatte, dann aber sehr helle Schatten aufwies. Wenn ein Baum im Hintergrund eines Motives lag, und im Vordergrund nur Wiese war, dann übte ich Kritik. Ich liege vielleicht falsch. Vielleicht liegt mal jemand anderes nicht richtig. Manchmal gibt es kein Richtig und Falsch sondern es zählt die Abwägung von Einschätzungen. Darum gibt es ja diesen offenen Reviewprozess. Jetzt lerne ich, dass ich störe. Ich darf wohl dennoch erwarten, dass Ihr mein Zutun entweder aushaltet oder mir erklärt, wo ich den Quidlines tatsächlich im Einzelnen zu Wider handle. Bitte unterlasst Unterstellungen wie etwa Böswilligkeit! Auch die pauschale Aussage, ich hätte keine Ahnung von den Quidelines finde ich unangemessen und inhaltlich falsch. In den Quidlines steht nicht, dass man erst von Euch geadelt werden oder eine Quidline-Schulung besuchen muss, oder einen über die Stimmberechtigung hinaus erforderlichen Rang erreichen soll. Wenn Ihr das wünscht, dann ändert doch bitte diese Richtlinien, um „falsche“ Meinungen zur Verschlankung Eures demokratischen Prozesses fernzuhalten. Ich habe mich mit Zeit und Interesse in diesen Prozess gegeben und ernte Euer negatives Feedback. Weil ich nur bedingt Lust habe, mich dem dauerhaft auszusetzen, biete ich Euch sehr gern an, mich aus der Mitwirkung vorrübergehend zurückzuziehen, wenn Ihr tatsächlich darauf besteht.--Augustgeyler (talk) 19:41, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltepunkt Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf vor dem Umbau 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 13:30, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hp Leipzig-Anger-Crottendorf mit einfahrender S-Bahn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gedenkstätte polnischer Soldaten im Zweiten Weltkrieg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Please remove the green fringes at the branches. --Ermell 20:31, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  Done repaired artifacts --Augustgeyler 23:46, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gedenkort der Opfer der Euthanasie in Leipzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 03:57, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Nummernschilder verpixelnEdit

Hallo Augustgeyler, bei den Quality imgaes candidates hattest du nachgefragt, ob es sinnvoll ist, Autokennzeichen unleserlich zu machen. Zumindest im deutschsprachigen Raum ist das nicht nötig. Siehe dazu de:Hilfe:Bilder/Autonummern verpixeln und speziell auch die zugehörige Diskussionsseite. --37.24.79.154 08:16, 30 September 2020 (UTC) Danke Dir!--Augustgeyler (talk) 19:26, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gräberfeld der 766 Kriegstoten verschiedener Nationen (Ostfriedhof Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erweiterte Gedenkstätte der ital. Soldaten im Zweiten Weltkrieg (Ostfriedhof Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
  Comment} The blurring looks unnatural and annoying. Also, the top and bottom of the picture is cropped too tight. For me it wouldn't be QI. -- Spurzem 15:23, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zweinaundorfer Straße mit Fernwärmeleitung und Bahnbaustelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:37, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baustelle am Haltepunkt Leipzig-Anger-Crottendorf-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK for QI --Isiwal 21:15, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostfriedhof Gedenkstaette Polnische-Opfer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
The totally blurred parts of the picture on the left and right bother me a lot. -- Spurzem 13:28, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
I am sorry this is bothering you. I intended this composition to show the trees sorrounding the place on which the monument is placed on. --Augustgeyler 09:41, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
I agree with User:Spurzem that the blurred left and right don't convey the intent. Could try cropping them out. --Tagooty 15:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  Done I tried cropping. --Augustgeyler 18:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 14:28, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Natursteinmauerwerk an einem Widerlager nummeriert für Wiedereinbau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality and detail. -- Crep171166 09:51, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baustelle am Haltepunkt Leipzig-Anger-Crottendorf-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 10:42, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leipzig Herrnhuterstrasse-2-landscape.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leipzig Mierendorffstraße-58 landscape.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. Some minor traces of CAs. --Aristeas 09:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertaler Schwebebahn – Station Landgericht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Stepro 00:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gedenkstätte der ital. Soldaten im Zweiten Weltkrieg (Ostfriedhof Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Sellerhäuser Straße 7 (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Sellerhäuser Straße 8 (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:55, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 October 2020 (UTC)