Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 10 2020

Consensual review edit

File:Märzstraße_90_Wien_2020-04-05_f_Maskaron.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Early 20th century façade in Vienna. --Tsui 21:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose I think the shadow on this picture is too blunt, sorry --NeoMeesje 23:16, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support OK, it's got shadows. Very good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:27, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support The shadows aren't ideal, but otherwise the photo is very good.--Peulle 07:33, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support OK for me too --George Chernilevsky 07:47, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Very high contrast well handled. Grazing lighting is a legitimate means of photographic interpretation. --Smial 09:29, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose It is a clear and straight composition, and shadows can be helpful in architecture photography. But I am with NeoMeesje, the shadow is to hard. --Augustgeyler 11:51, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support GQ Christian Ferrer 20:37, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per NeoMeesje. --Kallerna 20:06, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 21:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Fuente_de_la_boda,_Viena,_Austria,_2020-01-31,_DD_04.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Marriage Fountain, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 07:22, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose No sky for QI. Sorry. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 14:33, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
    We know that you cannot come along with criticism, but please, don't be so obvious when revenge voting like here, and comparing that sky with the one in this nomination doesn't put you in a good position, your behavior is toxic. Poco a poco 19:45, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Seems OK to me. The sky is not burned (easier to see in thumbnail form) and the actual fountain appears well rendered.--Peulle 11:06, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks like a completely normal overcast sky to me. I don't understand the problem. -- Ikan Kekek 11:10, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose. The sky is not burned. And the main object is taken very well. But I think the background (especially the left houses outer lines) is interacting not optimal with the main object. This could have been avoided with a shorter DOF, to give the background a bit more bluer.--Augustgeyler 11:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Moroder 00:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Aristeas 09:06, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Dull light. --Kallerna 20:08, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 21:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)