Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 16 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Iglesia_de_San_Nicolás,_Puertomarín,_Camino_de_Santiago,_Lugo,_España,_2015-09-19,_DD_15-17_HDR.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination St Nicholas church, Puertomarín, St James's Way, Lugo, Spain --Poco a poco 20:31, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:37, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
  • {o} (temporary and revokable of course) Needs a perspective correction IMO, especially at left. I'm not sure the rose is oval in real... Good night picture even not pinsharp, the rain did not help I guess.--Jebulon 09:40, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment   New version Poco a poco 22:02, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
  • {{s}} QI for me--Lmbuga 23:05, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment I really don´t want to bother you, it´s a great HDR-work. But it is still leaning to the right. It´s disturbing for me, because the edges are so close. If there wouldn´t be a crop like this (it´s not really a crop), it would be almost perfect! --Hubertl 07:46, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
  • {{neutral}} Thanks Hubertl, now I understand (with the note): The picture is improvable .--Lmbuga 11:31, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment No problem, Hubertl, I uploaded a   new version Poco a poco 12:38, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support no doubt, CI --Hubertl 13:54, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality --Lmbuga 23:08, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Pincushion distortion. In addition I'd suggest some downscaling, as it is allways distracting, if images which are perspective corrected show different sharpness in upper and bottom area. -- Smial 10:11, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support QI. Of course, this is not "rain", but stars... Sorry.--Jebulon 17:29, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 14:34, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Κάστρο Καράμπαμπα 0039.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Karababas castle, Chalkida. --C messier 07:44, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • {{o}} Needs noise reduction --Ermell 22:20, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
      Comment   Done Denoise, Ermell, it is not a good practice to decline on something easy to fix. --C messier 05:32, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Hubertl 07:38, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose a poor framing in my opinion Alvesgaspar 23:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Actually, nothing against the framing (how different/better could it be ?). A QI, for the rest.--Jebulon 17:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
  • A more generous one would be much better. Alvesgaspar 05:35, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
  • "Generous ?" Do you mean it is too tight ?--Jebulon 18:59, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 07:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)