Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 24 2016

Consensual review

edit

File:16-08-30-Vakabulli_Beach-Riga-RR2_3758.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Vakabulli Beach, Riga, Latvia --Ralf Roletschek 08:58, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:55, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose DoF too low. Important parts not in focus --A.Savin 02:06, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per A.Savin --Uoaei1 05:11, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Mild   Support - I definitely don't favor this much blur, but I think it's a valid artistic choice, and I don't view anything that's blurred as truly essential to the scene Ralf wants to depict. -- Ikan Kekek 07:20, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per A.Savin. --Peulle 21:01, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per A.Savin --Michielverbeek 05:14, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support per Ikan Kekek --Smial 10:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support usually, A.Savins decisions are very accurate, in this case I decide against. --Hubertl 19:25, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose look like focus point is too close. --PetarM 09:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per other users--Lmbuga 14:52, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 15:58, 23 October 2016 (UTC)