Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 27 2020

• 
  • Nomination Detail of a multiple dwelling with plastered façade in Leipzig – window with orginal roller shades from the period of promoterism. --Augustgeyler 23:59, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 00:04, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cultural heritage monument of a multiple dwelling with clinker façade in Leipzig. --Augustgeyler 23:53, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 00:05, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marin Blvd HBLR, Jersey City. --King of Hearts 22:58, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 00:08, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jersey City Main Post Office. --King of Hearts 22:58, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 00:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination African peguins at Boulders Beach, Cape Town. By --Bianogr 22:45, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Already nominated by MB one on 19-Oct - currently under discussion --Virtual-Pano 00:26, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dassault Falcon 8X on flying display at Paris Air Show 2019 --MB-one 22:47, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 00:18, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Quai du Wault in Lille, France --Velvet 18:10, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:53, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schmutzsprung (dirt jump), Südliche Weinstrasse, Deutschland. --Fischer.H 17:25, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support amazing action shot --Augustgeyler 17:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support excelent --Christian Ferrer 18:00, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination cultural heritage site in Canada --Wilfredor 14:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Out of focus and too noisy. Sorry. --Ermell 19:41, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose Out of focus and too much noise. --Ermell 19:56, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Real size resin skull, Chiapas Mexico, Image produced by combining two pictures --Cvmontuy 13:24, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Interesting --Wilfredor 14:44, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of the en:Saint-Étienne-Châteaucreux station, France. --Touam 12:21, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, the image is unsharp and noisy. --XRay 12:44, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mural in Amber Fort, Jaipur --Jakubhal 09:56, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:33, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alkanet (Anchusa officinalis) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:22, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 09:57, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sheesh Mahal (the Palace of Mirrors), Amber Fort in Jaipur --Jakubhal 08:49, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:33, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 35 Market Square in Świdnica --Jacek Halicki 08:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    A few dust spots on the sky. Otherwise good quality --Jakubhal 08:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)@Jakubhal: Fixed--Jacek Halicki 16:23, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 20:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 36 Market Square in Świdnica --Jacek Halicki 08:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 08:54, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1 Grodzka Street in Świdnica 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:50, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1 Grodzka Street in Świdnica 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:49, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 08:53, 24 October 2020 (UTC)@Jakubhal: Fixed--Jacek Halicki 15:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bugatti ready for departure at the Mille Miglia 93th edition 2020. --Moroder 08:19, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:43, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eastern wall of Amber Fort in Jaipur --Jakubhal 08:11, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:43, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sattais Kacheri, Amber Fort, Jaipur --Jakubhal 08:11, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:43, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination West Wing (North-West-facing) of Rundāle Palace --Scotch Mist 07:28, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 08:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cao fortress in Caminha, Viana do Castelo district, Portugal. --Tournasol7 06:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:24, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of the Saints Anthimus and Saturninus church in Brommat, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Lac du Bourget from La Chambotte, Savoy, France. --Tournasol7 06:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:26, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ruins od Blanquefort castle in Massegros Causses Gorges, Lozere, France. --Tournasol7 06:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:21, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Organ in the Johanneskirche in Michelau in the district of Lichtenfels --Ermell 06:08, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:21, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Doors in the catholic city parish church St.Veit in Iphofen --Ermell 06:08, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination War memorial in Harsdorf --Ermell 06:08, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:26, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door of the church St.Martin in Harsdorf --Ermell 06:08, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:15, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crucifixion group, right side altar "Maria im Leid", pilgrimage church Maria zu den Ketten, Zell am Harmersbach --Llez 06:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:24, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bratislava Castle, Slovakia --Poco a poco 06:04, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:27, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winning Gates, Bratislava Castle, Slovakia --Poco a poco 06:04, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:33, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bratislava Castle, Slovakia --Poco a poco 06:04, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 08:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bratislava Castle, Slovakia --Poco a poco 06:04, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:25, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flower bud of a Dahlia 'Happy Single First Love'. Single soft peach/apricot / orange flowers. Focus stack of 18 photos.
    --Famberhorst 05:50, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn  Question Unfortunately far below 2 MP, do you have a larger version? --Llez 06:10, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
    Unfortunately, I don't have another version. Thank you for your comments.--Famberhorst 15:33, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Information on the tomb of Menno van Coehoorn in the Vaste Burchtkerk (Wijckel)
    --Famberhorst 05:50, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:11, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monument of the Cimaschi family in the Monumental cemetery in Brescia. --Moroder 04:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    Dust spots above and to left of monument and top of monument, sculptures would benefit from sharpening --Scotch Mist 07:43, 24 October 2020 (UTC)  I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the notes but the top is not very good --Moroder 08:14, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ready for departure at the Mille Miglia 93th edition 2020 of the number 8. --Moroder 04:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:45, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Departure at the Mille Miglia 93th edition 2020 of the number 23. --Moroder 04:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:50, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mille Miglia 93th edition 2020 of the number 25. Crew Riccardo Perletti and Maika Perletti on Bugatti. --Moroder 04:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:46, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gastrimargus sp. cf Gastrimargus verticalis --Charlesjsharp 21:39, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:28, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Locust (Kraussaria angulifera) --Charlesjsharp 21:39, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:28, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Locust (Kraussaria angulifera) --Charlesjsharp 21:39, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:28, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint-Corentin Chapel in Île-de-Sein (Finistère, France). --Gzen92 10:35, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:48, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fall colours along River Bhaga below Gemur village, Himachal, India. Elev. 3,250m (10,663') --Tagooty 03:21, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Oversharpned --Michielverbeek 05:28, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for the feedback. I've reduced the sharpening from 41 to 10 in LR. Please review the new version. --Tagooty 13:46, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
    Good quality, a strong sun refelction in the water --Michielverbeek 06:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC) --Michielverbeek 06:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from beneath the trees of Nativity of Christ Cathedral in Riga --Scotch Mist 06:18, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn Main subject is in the shade. --Kallerna 07:39, 23 October 2020 (UTC)  I withdraw my nomination - Not sure 'shade' overrides 'composition' but rather than solicit further discussion ... --Scotch Mist 09:25, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A memorial of the fallen and missed people of the WWII. --PantheraLeo1359531 18:32, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Would raise the shadows a bit --MB-one 18:44, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for the review, shadows raised --PantheraLeo1359531 11:50, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good now --MB-one 11:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 28 Market Square in Świdnica --Jacek Halicki 07:28, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:15, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Universal heat engine (large transport treatment solution) during the "Armiya 2020" exhibition. --Kirill Borisenko 18:09, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
    It's a bit oversharpened. --MB-one 19:23, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
    Is that better now? --Kirill Borisenko 00:13, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose Unfortunately blurring the image, doesn't really help. If the raw image file is not available, I'm afraid this one is not fixable. --MB-one 13:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Misurinasee Nordufer, im Hintergrund die 3 Zinnen, Hochpustertal, Südtirol, Italien. --Fischer.H 17:29, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    Too small for me from Canon EOS 5D Mark II --George Chernilevsky 19:01, 19 October 2020 (UTC) I withdraw my nomination --Fischer.H 16:29, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tower guard Alikovich: the territory of "small Town dead", the slope of the mountain Rimini-rag, Dargavs, Prigorodny district of North Ossetia --Александр Байдуков 02:19, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 04:32, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lahell residential area October 2020.--Peulle 22:10, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Slight vignetting can be fixed --Moroder 05:11, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Finishing of the middle part of the Western facade of the Kazan Cathedral. 2 Kazanskaya square, Central district, Saint Petersburg --Александр Байдуков 06:09, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 05:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Radio mast of Força Réal, Pyrénées-Orientales (France). --Palauenc05 22:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Why did you delete metadata? --Podzemnik 01:20, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
    I've explained many times before that for some reason, my system doesn't provide exif-data. As they aren't mandatory, I'm not keen to buy new equipment. --Palauenc05 11:46, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
    *  Support Good quality also without metadatas -- Spurzem 10:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entrance of the Gesù church where people are taking shelter (Saint-Josse-ten-Noode, Belgium) --Trougnouf 08:43, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Please categorize it with vandalism --Moroder 05:00, 24 October 2020 (UTC)  Done I added Category:Graffiti in Brussels, thank you. --Trougnouf 08:24, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Fjord Park in Drammen, October 2020.--Peulle 07:15, 16 October 2020 (UTC) Request Please withdraw, it's a double nomination --Moroder 05:03, 24 October 2020 (UTC) Sorry, I meant to nominate a different one. Must have been drunk or something when I did this.--Peulle 21:23, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Hahaha, I hope with a good glass of Südtiroler Wein --Moroder 04:04, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Orthodox_Cathedral_Riga_07.jpg

• Nomination Towers of Nativity of Christ Cathedral – Russian Orthodox Church in Riga, Latvia --Scotch Mist 06:18, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Underexposed. --Kallerna 07:38, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment @Kallerna: Would appreciate the views of others, especially on whether apparent 'underexposure' automatically rules out QI irrespective of whether any significant detail is lost or not (this is not my reading of QI Guidelines) and if necessary whether any 'remedial action' can be taken? --Scotch Mist 08:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose The photographer tried to compensate for the overexposed gold on the dome. Unfortunately this did not work. Gold is always problematic.--Ermell 10:34, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 10:49, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Orthodox_Cathedral_Riga_06.jpg

• Nomination Dome Perspective of Nativity of Christ Cathedral in Riga --Scotch Mist 06:18, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Too mush sky, it looks underexposed --Podzemnik 19:52, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose underexposed, perspective. --Kallerna 07:38, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Done @Podzemnik: Thanks for your review - have cropped and adjusted WB --Scotch Mist 07:43, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment @Kallerna: Would appreciate the views of others, especially on whether apparent 'underexposure' automatically rules out QI irrespective of whether any significant detail is lost or not (this is not my reading of QI Guidelines) and if necessary whether any 'remedial action' can be taken? --Scotch Mist 08:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:03, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

File:The_Haunting_Tree.jpg

• Nomination The Haunting Tree --Jim Evans 19:55, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Comment Can we get more specific categories? GEO tag would be extremely useful --Podzemnik 06:07, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment I find Categories difficult. I did what I could. If a GEO tag is the coordinates of the location where the picture was taken I would have to guess. Jim Evans 13:10, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Question Is a GEO tag required for QI images? Jim Evans 11:07, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment No but it is very helpful, especially if there is no other way (within Wikimedia) to pinpoint the location of your shot, like a specific category or linked article. (A tree in Houston has less educational value than a specific tree that can be tracked over time.) I think the descriptive location is OK if that's all you have, though if the tree is your subject then you should identify its species. --Trougnouf 10:02, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment I'm sorry, I don't know the species of the tree.

•  Oppose too much noise in criss crossing branches --Virtual-Pano 14:56, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment I'm moving this to discussion mostly to try to understand how far afield reasons for disapproval of images can go. Apparently whether an image has enough categories has been accepted as a criteria for some time. It seems to me it has little to do with whether an image is of good quality. But, coordinates? I don't understand what location has to do with whether an image is of good quality?. I haven't checked but I suspect there are many images approved for QI that have no coordinates. Again, I don't understand how the species of the tree relates to the quality of the image. --- As for the complaint about digital noise. I see no unusual digital noise. When there's noise it's usually apparent first in the sky, but I see none it the tree either. Finally, I apologize for missing the request for a general location. As the image description explains, the tree is located beside the Johnson Space Center, off Space Center Blvd., somewhere between Middlebrook Drive & NASA Road 1. -- Jim Evans 13:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment imo the subject should be identified and the categories should capture the subject and the location. Proper categorization is one of the criteria listed in Commons:Image_guidelines#Image_page_requirements; it adds greatly to the educational value which is Commons' main goal (see Commons:Project_scope: "makes available public domain and freely-licensed educational media content to all ... "educational" is to be understood according to its broad meaning of "providing knowledge; instructional or informative""; quality is not necessarily just technical quality but in this scope educational value or the amount of information counts). If the location is vague or wide then geocoordinates are a big help. Geocoordinates are always appreciated but I think the location description you provided is fine. If your subject is a particular tree then it needs to be identified on the same basis as any life form. I think it would be fine to capture a scene where the tree is present and describe the scene, but there is nothing else to go for here. I think the quality is ok, there is not the greatest amount of detail but it's good enough for QI. Your assumption of noise is not entirely correct; noise is easily visible in the sky because the sky should be smooth (low frequency) whereas noise has high frequency, but noise is the sensor's uncertainty and it shows up mainly when increasing the captured values, ie increasing ISO or raising the shadows. In this case you left the shadows looking black but if you raised their value such that details become visible then there would be significant noise. Note that your picture shows some noise visible in the sky here at a reasonable zoom level, but not a disturbing amount. --Trougnouf 17:50, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment I have placed a note box on the noise I am referring to --Virtual-Pano 00:03, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support I don't think the note made by Virtual-Pano shows noise, it looks like a real feature in the tree. Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 17:11, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose It is a well composed image. But its level of detail is quit low. Noise reduction made it worse. --Augustgeyler 22:40, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment For the record, no noise reduction was applied. -Jim Evans 12:45, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment @Jim Evans: That makes me wonder even more. Did the level of detail get lost while processing? Or is that a sensor issue? There is not meta data about your camera. So I can not verify that. Why didn't you upload that information? --Augustgeyler 15:56, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment If this comes from the out-of-camera JPEG instead of RAW then the camera does denoising, sharpening, etc as part of its built-in processing pipeline. Metadata would be nice indeed. --Trougnouf 19:44, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment As it turns out you're correct. I keep turning NR off but somewhere along the way it will switch back on. So, my statement was incorrect, in-camera noise reduction was applied. Sorry.

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:02, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Iglesia_del_colegio_de_los_Jesuitas,_Ponta_Delgada,_isla_de_San_Miguel,_Azores,_Portugal,_2020-07-30,_DD_21-23_HDR.jpg

• Nomination Church of the Jesuit College, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 07:11, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose lens flare upper left --MB-one 16:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Info The reviewer deleted his vote. --Augustgeyler 12:44, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment I cannot see any flares, can you please add a note? Poco a poco 17:56, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Done. Also the left spotlight is considerably brighter and thus appears much bigger, which throws off the balance IMO. --MB-one 11:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

• MB-one it would be great to get at least some feedback from you Poco a poco 17:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
•  New version I've removed the flare but I don't believe that I should reduce the brightness of that spotlight on the left, it isn't my fault and this isn't FP Poco a poco 08:57, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Please, let's discuss it before the bot wipes the nom away --Poco a poco 17:09, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment No problem with the spot, but the image should be rotated a little CCW and then cropped exactly symmetrically. --Smial 10:52, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

• Smial:  Rotated Poco a poco 21:03, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Ok, that's fine. --Smial 22:58, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:02, 26 October 2020 (UTC)