Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 04 2019

Consensual review edit

File:Kirtimandir.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Temple of Fame, is the cenotaph of the Gaekwads, located in the city of Vadodara. --Vijay B. Barot 17:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Tilted, distortion --Pudelek 13:48, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment: This is not a reason for a rejection, the errors can be corrected. --Manfred Kuzel 08:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose for now per Pudelek. This is a reason for rejection. If it is fixable, normally we give a week to do so, before declining. I´m afraid, the crop is too tight here for a successful correction. --Milseburg 09:03, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others.--Peulle 07:29, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 10:42, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Zusatzzeichen_in_Plauen_20190829.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Additional road sign in Germany where "kostenpflichtig" was transferred to "kostenlos". --PantheraLeo1359531 14:11, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:41, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose If it were a misprint, I would find it original. But such mischief seems not worth to be photographed. Incidentally, the sign is not well photographed. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 23:06, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Spurzem. Kostenlospflichtig? --Milseburg 05:25, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Originelle Aufnahme und daher QI for me. --Manfred Kuzel 06:08, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Hallo Manfred, das Ganze hier sollten wir freilich nicht überbewerten. Aber ein bisschen Ernst gehört meines Erachens trotzdem dazu. Deshalb die Frage: Kannst Du mir sagen, was an dem Foto originell sein könnte? Schmierereien wie auf dem Schild sind albern und Sachbeschädigung. Und außerdem müsste für QI ein kleines Mindestmaß an fotografischer Qualität erwartet werden dürfen. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem 15:27, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose tilt, underexposed, too low DOF. --Smial 09:29, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Spurzem and Smial. I agree that a photo of such a simple subject (motif) should be technically flawless if it wants to become a QI. At least the tilt/perspective and the exposure should be corrected. --Aristeas 09:12, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 10:41, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Korinth_BW_2017-10-10_10-58-26.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Greece, Ancient Corinth, Agora --Berthold Werner 13:28, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion   OpposeBuilding left in the background is hanging a bit to the right --Michielverbeek 17:12, 27 August 2019 (UTC)After repairing   Support --Michielverbeek 07:16, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
      Comment Sometimes I feel like the vertical lines are overrated. Where is the building with the wall hanging to the side? For me it is a beautiful and good image. -- Spurzem 20:45, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
    Please more opinions --Michielverbeek 20:58, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
    *I agree with Michielverbeek, especially since it is not a problem to correct the small defect. --Manfred Kuzel 08:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)   Question Could someone give a clear vote in advance before sending it to CR? --Milseburg 18:43, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
    *Yes, I can vote as soon as the defect is resolved. --Manfred Kuzel 06:03, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Doesn‘t seem relevant to me. Nice composition and light --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:48, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Needs some CCW rotation. The buildings in the middle background also lean somewhat to the right. No relevant perspective issues, just a bit rotation. --Smial 09:42, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  •   Done rotated 1,6° ccw --Berthold Werner 14:40, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
    • Now   Support. Good rework, thx. --Smial 15:03, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Now it is a QI for me, thx. --Manfred Kuzel 16:24, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good now. --Aristeas 09:13, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 10:41, 3 September 2019 (UTC)