Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 08 2016

Consensual review edit

File:Groningen, straatzicht, Stationsstraat foto4 2015-03-22 12.22.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Stationsstraat, Groningen. (by Michielverbeek) --C messier 08:19, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Slight CA (see the clock tower on the right) --Jacek79 21:16, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment I can't see it even if with pixel peeping. And it isn't good practice to decline for something easy to correct. --C messier 08:49, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment The CA is now removed. That has to be the tinies CA I've ever corrected! ;) W.carter 08:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Acceptable.   Comment Couldn't find any significant CA, but some tiny spots where demosaicing could have done a somewhat better job. Nothing to worry about. --Smial 11:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality --Milseburg 11:53, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support I don't see CAs, sorry; but the vertical lines of the left are not stright. In spite of this, QI for me--Lmbuga 19:29, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 19:18, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Hammam Tunisia.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Hammam's interior - tepidarium --Aymen FANTAR 23:21, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 03:18, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

*   Oppose I do not agree. The file hasn't a meaningful filename. --XRay 05:20, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

  •   Neutral Much better now. --XRay 18:47, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support The file has been renamed and file's page has been cleaned up and improved so QI. BUT, Aymen FANTAR, this (and other images you have nominated) has been fixed up by other very kind editors here, all this is something that you should have done yourself as nominator or even better, you should have fixed before you nominated the picture. Please remember this in the future. W.carter 10:51, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
  • All we now this is a hammam in Tunisia. We need more exact information, what is the name of the hammam, in which town it is and a geotage is pretty usefull. I guess there isn't only one hamman in Tunisia. Termporally   Oppose. --C messier 12:06, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
  • I'm sorry i dont how to edit my files i'm learning how to do it i have all the informations about my image just i can't change filenames add GL...Aymen FANTAR 10:09, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Hello Aymen FANTAR, glad you showed up here. Let us start with you writing all the information about the files on the different files' pages. You go to the part that says "Summary" on the file page and click on "Edit". In the window you write all information about the picture after the line that says "|description={{en| " and save. When that is done I'll get back to you with the next step about how to add categories and change the file's name. I'll leave that info on your talk page as soon as the descriptions are in place. If you have any troubles you can ask them on your own talk page, I will be looking at it for a while now. :) --W.carter 11:44, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Thanks W.carter i think i founded how to fix itAymen FANTAR 12:04, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Is it better now? how ca i change file name and nomination Aymen FANTAR 13:19, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Aymen FANTAR It is much better now, I am glad that you learn quickly. :) As I said on your talk page, you don't have to change anything about the nomination, it will be updated if you request a renaming just like you did on some of your other pictures. Now we just wait and see when the other editors have time to come here and vote. Many are at work right now. W.carter 14:00, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Adding the "camera location" was great! But please take a look at the other categories that I added, they will give you a clue of how you should think when selecting categories. --W.carter 14:10, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks ok to me Poco a poco 18:30, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 19:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Duisburg,_Landschaftspark_Duisburg-Nord_--_2012_--_3618.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Blast furnace 2, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord in Duisburg, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 15:28, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Hubertl 15:53, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not yet, sorry. Get rid of all the green/red CAs and I'll change this to promote. --W.carter 18:23, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
    •   Fixed Sorry. I just removed all the CAs I've found. Thank you. --XRay 05:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
      • Thanks, but unfortunately there is still some green CA left, see notes. W.carter 09:00, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
        • Remove CAs at one side, new CAs appear at the other side. I just removed nearly all CAs now. Thanks for your review. --XRay 16:10, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support All clear now. :) Yes, CAs can really be a pain in the ***. Thanks for your patience. W.carter 20:51, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Somewhat soft in all corners, but all in all ok. -- Smial 09:14, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Spurzem 15:47, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 19:14, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Rissen_johanniskirche_aussen_04.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Church in Hamburg-Rissen --Dirtsc 08:30, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:46, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose CAs --Uoaei1 12:31, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Still CAs... --Smial 09:17, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 19:13, 7 September 2016 (UTC)