Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 08 2019

Consensual review edit

File:Ali_Akbar_Sana'ti_Museum_of_Tehran_MSH_(2).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Ali Akbar Sanati Museum. By User:Mshokrnia --Dirandold 13:22, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:03, 5 September 2019 (UTC) --Berthold Werner 06:31, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, but only 1,5 mp. --ArildV 16:15, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Die Kameradaten lassen darauf schließen, daß es sich hier um einen Ausschnitt aus einem sehr großen und besonders guten und scharfen Foto handelt. Ich bin daher der Meinung, daß man in einem solchen Fall die Regel über die Pixelanzahl nicht überbewerten und flexibel anwenden sollte, weshalb das Foto für mich ein QI verdient. --Manfred Kuzel 04:05, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 13:58, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Mercedes-Benz_EQ_A,_IAA_2017,_Frankfurt_(1Y7A2963).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz EQ A, IAA 2017 --MB-one 23:21, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Oppose Rotes Leuchtband mit Mercedes-Stern in der Mitte. Vom EQ A ist im Dunkeln wenig zu sehen. -- Spurzem 06:21, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
      Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:25, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
    Please discuss. -- Spurzem 07:13, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
      Support Ich finde die Komposition durchaus gelungen und qualitativ gut. --Steindy 18:54, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 13:57, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Shadhu_in_Pasupatinath_Temple-1968.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Shadhu in Pasupatinath Temple --Bijay chaurasia 04:57, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion   OpposeThe bottom is too unsharp for me, a higher f-value would have been better --Michielverbeek 07:10, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
      Support Wow for me. The head is in focus. The DoF is short but that's a choice of the photographer in my opinion. Low DoF is sometimes very appreciated aesthetically, then I don't think this is a mistake. High resolution. Very good light. The man seems natural. Good composition. It would be even better if the perspectives were corrected --Basile Morin 02:04, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Very good impressive image -- Spurzem 15:20, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Face and right hand have nearly perfect sharpness, low DOF is usual and acceptable composition element in portrait photography. Good work. --Smial 16:54, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support per Smial. --Aristeas 08:39, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support per Smial & Spurzem. A very good impression of the person. --Steindy 11:50, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 13:56, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

File:পানিতে_নিমজ্জিত_রাতারগুল_জলাবনের_গাছ.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Ratargul Swamp Forest. By User:Tawkir.ahmad --RockyMasum 07:13, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose A lot of CAs are at the branches. Please fix them first. --XRay 04:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Agnes. --Manfred Kuzel 03:46, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per XRay. Please fix the CAs; especially at the top left they are really irritating. --Aristeas 09:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per XRay and Aristeas. The note has been in existence for six days and nothing has happened. --Steindy 11:45, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 13:55, 7 September 2019 (UTC)