Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 13 2020

Consensual review edit

File:Torre_Campanaria_centro_San_Felice_del_Benaco.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Belltower of the parish church of San Felice del Benaco. --Moroder 01:22, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Very slightly tilted CW --MB-one 11:43, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
      Done Thanks --Moroder 06:16, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Somewhat overexposed too, with blown sky and lots of magenta CA on the leaves; let's go to CR and see what people think.--Peulle 12:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment The sky is not “blown” it’s only overcast due to weather conditions --Moroder 12:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Maybe, but the CA are still off the scale.--Peulle 17:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support The sky seems ok to me. --MB-one 13:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sky is OK but CA on leaves on the left has to be corrected. -- Ikan Kekek 23:34, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Agree about decline. Too strong magenta CA. --Halavar 10:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 11:22, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Ebrach_Baumwipfelpfad_Rollator-20171017-RM-113150.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Man with rollator on the treetop path in Steigerwald near Ebrach --Ermell 05:56, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose This doesn't look like a QI to me, the subject is partially hidden and detail is not the best --Poco a poco 08:18, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
  • I disagree. --Ermell 10:53, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support OK for me --Llez 18:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Me too. -- Ikan Kekek 06:49, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose This doesn't look like an ideal composition to me, with the person's head obscured and the bridge shot somewhat haphazardly, leaving the subject unclear. The resolution is also a bit low.--Peulle 07:42, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose IMHO the casual foreground and the rail hiding the person's head disturb any intention of this picture. --PtrQs 20:33, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others --Cvmontuy 13:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 11:21, 12 September 2020 (UTC)