Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 26 2023

Consensual review edit

File:CH.ZG.Zug_2023-03-31_Zugersee_6586b_3x2-R_6K.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Storm Mathis above lake Zug in Switzerland. By User:Roy Egloff --Yann 08:46, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose impressive shot with high documentary value and wow factor - noise and detail level not on QI level, sorry --Virtual-Pano 09:00, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree There is some loss of detail due to the high ISO setting, but this setting is unavoidable due to lighting conditions. The result is amazingly good and the image is easily printable in good quality A4 size. --Smial 12:00, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Virtual-Pano --F. Riedelio 07:51, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support. Impressive and good. I don't understand the critism. -- Spurzem 13:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support I'm not sure what is wrong with detail level. The back is a bit blurred, but this may be caused by fog from water or rain or whatever. Foreground has nice details and sharpness. --Nino Verde (talk) 14:19, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Yes, lightning condition and necessity of short exposure times make it harder to handle, but I think if we reduce the amount of pixels a bit, we have a good image here --PantheraLeo1359531 16:02, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Yes, there is some noise, but the image of that wave is striking, and for me, it outweighs technical shortcomings --Jakubhal 16:41, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support per others. --Milseburg 10:35, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 15:43, 25 September 2023 (UTC)