Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 29 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Zeiss_Milvus_14_50_2.jpg edit

 

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 08:02, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hapalopeza nilgirica-Kadavoor-2015-08-21-003.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Odontomantis sp., adult (highly camouflage with leaves; nymph mimics ants) - Jkadavoor 06:52, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Comment Needs more light. --C messier 19:02, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
      Comment Done now. C messier, sorry for the late attempt; I was away for a week. Jkadavoor 16:16, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
      Comment Exposure is OK, but background needs denoising. --C messier 13:17, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose eyes should be in focus.--Ermell 09:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment IMHO, they are. --C messier 13:57, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment the wings are much sharper for me than the eyes.--Ermell 07:28, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 15:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Chateau-de-Fleury-en-Bière-DSC_0092.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Castle of Fleury-en-Bière, Seine et Marne, France --Pline 21:48, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Tilted ccw --Uoaei1 04:27, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:38, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment Still tilted, correction needed --Uoaei1 04:17, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
No, see the Verticales left and right. --Ralf Roletschek 10:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
I see verticals on both sides leaning to the left, especially at the right. Horizontal lines are also not straight. --Uoaei1 06:27, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
I have uploaded a new version with tilt correction--Pline 11:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Spurzem 06:22, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 04:45, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Galleria delle carte geografiche (Vatican Museums) September 2015-1a.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Map Room in the Vatican Museums (detail of ceiling) -- Alvesgaspar 18:40, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Some corner unsharpness, but overall good quality. --C messier 19:09, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Hey! I was there !. I think the leaning of the angles of the room should be symmetrical. A slight correction should correct this, and I'll support !--Jebulon 19:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support good quality - please don´t cut anything --An-d 17:46, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 04:44, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

File:נמל_עכו_ספינה.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Fishing boat in the port of Akko, Israel. By User:Liorbardov --Geagea 00:11, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality.--6AND5 21:08, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose CAs, quite noisy and too much tone mapping (grey halo above the clouds). Fixable, IMHO. --C messier 18:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose as C messier. --Hubertl 08:39, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Shadow and higlight overdone and too much clarity added.--Ermell 09:14, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --C messier 13:28, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Mandeln für Printen.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination A lot of Almonds --Elrond 18:40, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Lacks sharpness, way to shallow DOF. Denis Barthel 22:24, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
      Info this was my purpose to demonstrate the huge amounts --Elrond 05:16, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
      Comment Not photographic review: check categories. --C messier 18:51, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 15:52, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Avignon_-_Notre_dame_des_doms.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Notre-Dame des Doms cathedrale in Avignon --Marianne Casamance 15:55, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --XRay 16:02, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree: Even when allowing some incline for close distance photography of high buildings, there should be a symmetry of the angles. In total, there is also still too much distortion (e.g. the cross is leaning in very strong). Also the sculpture on top is out of focus. --Cccefalon 17:00, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sculpture overexposed, perspective issues, overall not really sharp. I do not demand straight verticals in every architectural image, but in this image the used perspective does not support the composition. The building with it's surrounding simply looks crooked. Not fixable because a correction would increase unsharpness. -- Smial 09:57, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 07:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)