Comment : You're right but would you, please, add "SW (or SE) view" to the scope as we usually do here ? Thanks in advance. --JLPC (talk) 18:00, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think that removing objects from the picture (here: electric cables) are not good option. When I was in Lviv I'm also frustrated because of these cables, but we shouldn't remove them. This picture might be use in wikipedia articles and it must showing the real object as it looks. Halavar (talk) 18:08, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Image doesn't show the reality. It can't be used in Wikipedia articles. Sorry. If you bring back those electric cables, I'm gonna support your image. For now, best in scope is "Lwów - Cerkiew Uspieńska.jpg". Halavar (talk) 17:38, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment As I was really absent-minded, I've suppressed the two wires, as a compensation. I hope it's better now and... Mile will agree. --JLPC (talk) 11:04, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Huge error I made, didt see that part so I forgot. Thanx JLPC. One more error I have just corrected. Since all Orthodox churches and monasteries have eneterance and altar turned to East...actually enterance of this is to West, but then you turn twice to left where altar is, I was there few times on mass. As per Halvar - I would agree in case object of VI-ing would be corrected, in this case those two wires were completely irrelevant and not part of church. That other one suggested image is also badly cropped, composition not so lucky. --Mile (talk) 14:00, 1 October 2013 (UTC) Info I know this object and this place. In this image we see EAST and SOUTH-EAST side of the church, not west as you wrote now. So it is a bad scope. Please look at the map. Halavar (talk) 14:31, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
