Info This is an example for an image that can be described by the term "Etchi" or "Ecchi". But it can also refer to the general style of a manga or anime drawing. There is no other image available on commons that can be referred as ecchi or moe. --Niabot (talk) 00:46, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Opposeas not yet eligible for VI status. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it cannot at present become a valued image since it currently fails valued image criterion 2 (does not have a suitably generic scope). I have not reviewed the nomination against all the criteria, but if you are able to fix this issue and would like me to re-evaluate the image please leave me a message on my talk page. --Eusebius (talk) 09:04, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question You also have an svg version, which sorts of more valuable to me, as I suppose it has been used to generate the png? I am aware the svg renderer in the mediawiki software can sometimes mess up some details. Is that your reason for nominating the png? -- Slaunger (talk) 21:50, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the scope is relevant for Wikimedia projects and I think it fulfills other criteria. Hard to find other images showing the scope of a "naughty" manga character. This one was the only alternative I found, but the nominated image clearly wins; it is a lot more sophisticated and subtle (beautiful artwork by the way, you sure are talented) and seems to hit pretty spot on, what ecchi manga is about. A topic I first had to familiarize myself with. Refreshing to something completely new on VI. -- Slaunger (talk) 22:12, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not totally convinced. I can see that sometimes eyebrows are drawn on top, and even lashes. But hair behind the eyes?? That's stretching it a bit. (even that seems normal. Lycaon (talk) 18:16, 11 November 2008 (UTC)) Anyway, I've seen enough to drop my opposition, thanks for pointing it out. Lycaon (talk) 18:09, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]