Review (criteria )
Comment Interesting but it lacks the geocoding of the caption of the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk ) 06:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC) [ reply ]
Comment I geocoded using this picture but a confirmation could be a good thing. Totodu 74 (talk ) 09:30, 25 June 2012 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk ) 10:20, 25 June 2012 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose For me, there is no sense of the scale of the work. I find File:Mamut en parque de barcelona.jpg better because there are enough people to make clear the size of the sculpture, but not so many that it is obscured (as in File:Mamut Barcelona.JPG ). cmadler (talk ) 14:51, 25 June 2012 (UTC) [ reply ]
Comment Sorry, I forgot to geocode. Thanks to Totodu 74 but I did check it and make it more accurate. I understand the scale argument, but there is a pigeon on the left tusk (to have an idea) :) --Selbymay (talk ) 15:52, 25 June 2012 (UTC) [ reply ]
On the satellite view of Google maps, we can see the tusks with your geocoding: good! :) Totodu 74 (talk ) 16:59, 25 June 2012 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Trees (and the pigeon, yes) give a good scale, and people on File:Mamut en parque de barcelona.jpg are disturbing, the crop very (and too) tight, and the sculpture seems not horizontal. Totodu 74 (talk ) 16:59, 25 June 2012 (UTC) [ reply ]