Commons:Valued image candidates/Common mormon (Papilio polytes romulus) female form romulus in flight Babai bridge.jpg

Common mormon (Papilio polytes romulus) female form romulus in flight Babai bridge.jpg

**promoted**
Image
Nominated by	Charles (talk) on 2019-12-30 13:01 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Papilio polytes romulus (Common mormon) female form romulus in flight
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	It is indeed a recognized subspecies and not a form. In the category many images are false, the one that is presented too. Look at the reference in wikispecies. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:37, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply] Comment Confusing. My reference is Colin Smith, Illustrated Checklist of Nepal's Butterflies 2006 where he describes Papilio polytes romolus form romolus (and the two other forms) . The Wikispecies article doesn't seem to help. Has the taxononomy been changed? The Wikipedia article must be out of date too. Charles (talk) 12:41, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply] The formulation is correct, I ended up finding another image that this subspecies is better Common Mormon Papilio polytes Female Form Romulus by kadavoor.jpg. But the real underlying problem is that many categories are incomprehensible because they are not classified. I do this work when I can but I will no longer vote for unclassified categories. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply] Yes, I agree. And you do a great job. It is a real problem and some users upload too many almost-identical images. It takes me ages to go through them all. The photo you reference is a much nicer photo. I nominated mine with an in flight scope. But it's not a great shot! Charles (talk) 13:39, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply] Support I hadn't thought about it: the scope is perfectly acceptable. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 4 January 2020 (UTC)`[reply]