Commons:Valued image candidates/Frog vivisection.jpg

Frog vivisection.jpg

**promoted**
Image
Nominated by	Muhammad on 2008-10-19 07:06 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Amphibian Vivisection
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Oppose Nothing of specialized "Medical" athmosphere --Twdragon (talk) 17:55, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply] Question I don't understand what you mean by that. Frog vivisection is commonly used in an educational context, and I find it quite natural that it is not in a fancy medical environment. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:00, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply] Comment and Question I think the scope is fine, and I think the image illustrates the scope well. Although the scope does not relate to a specific species (and it shouldn't) I would still like to know what frog species it is. That is not stated on the image page. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:00, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply] Comment I also think you should add some more details on the image page concerning where and in what context the depicted vivisection is done. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:01, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply] Species name and other details added to the image page. The species name is as accurate as my teacher's info Muhammad 16:08, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply] Support Thank you. With these additions to the image page I am willing to support. -- Slaunger (talk) 18:27, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply] Support - I think this image satisfies all requirements and is of very high quality. (Is it just me, or can anyone else smell formaldehyde when looking at that picture? :)) J.smith (talk) 00:29, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply] Chloroform, actually, according to the image page. Formaldehyde is for preserving dead tissue isn't it? -- Slaunger (talk) 06:46, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply] Maybe, but my only experienced involved formaldehyde so thats what it reminds me of. --J.smith (talk) 08:38, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply] Result: 2 support, 1 oppose => promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 15:59, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]