Commons:Valued image candidates/GrandMastersPalace-Malta-2.jpg

GrandMastersPalace-Malta-2.jpg

**declined**
Image
Nominated by	MrPanyGoff (talk) on 2010-09-13 07:31 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Grandmaster's Palace (Interior)
Used in	Global usage
Reason	The photo gives representative view of the interior (the armoury corridor here) of the grandmasters's palace in Valletta, Malta. -- MrPanyGoff (talk)
Review (criteria)	Oppose Scope too narrow. Lycaon (talk) 07:41, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] ---- Scope changed from Category:Grandmaster's Palace Corridor Frescos to Category:Grandmaster's Palace Interior --MrPanyGoff (talk) 07:54, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn". Comment Scope is better now, but there is some (IMO) better competition. Lycaon (talk) 12:14, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] Don't you think that the photos representing general (exterior or interior) views of buildings are somehow privileged than the ones representing fragments and details? I mean when we compare them together in a shared scope. I think that the images of details present different things no matter if they were taken in one and the same room with the general ones. So, isn't it equitable to separate the fragment/detail photos in their own scope? In this connection, can't we created both categories: “Building name” (interior) and “Building name” (interior details) as well as “Building name” (exterior) and “Building name” (exterior details)? --MrPanyGoff (talk) 15:27, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 0 support, 1 oppose => declined. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:20, 17 September 2010 (UTC)`[reply]