Commons:Valued image candidates/Kalksteenrots met in het midden een breccie. 10-09-2019. (actm.) 02.jpg

Kalksteenrots met in het midden een breccie. 10-09-2019. (actm.) 02.jpg

**promoted**
Image
Nominated by	Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2019-12-11 18:22 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Erosion by freezing of a limestone breccia
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Comment I would think the scope would be "Breccia with limestone pavement". Do you mean habitat? If so, what animals live where this type of rock is present that make the habitat rare? I suspect you just mean that this combination of minerals is rare, but I think that should be in the file description, rather than the scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:44, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] In mineralogy the term Habitus is used. But only for crystals not for rocks. The aspect is that of an erosion of granite by frost but I do not know enough rocks to know the qualifier. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:21, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] Answer: we have done mountain tours under the guidance of a geologist. We went to this stone separately because, according to the geologist, this stone is very special. We first sent the text with the photo to the geologist and asked that the description was correct. Greetings --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:48, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] OK, but even so "a rare habitat" is a description for the file description, not the scope. By analogy: A bird can be rare or common, but its scope is still its Latin name, with the English vernacular name (if any) in parentheses. Also, this is Breccia, not Breccia Breccia, and in English, only the first word in a sentence (or quasi-sentence like a VI scope) and proper names (and adjectives made from them) are capitalized, so I still think my suggested scope is formatted correctly. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] Done.I hope I have understood correctly. Thanks for the review.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:05, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] Support - I'll certainly call this useful. If anyone knows of a better photo in scope, go for it, but it sure looks to me like this is best in scope. Thank you for bearing with us, Agnes. In a way, I'm sorry we do all this stuff in English, as it's a real difficulty for many great photographers. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:08, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] ~~Oppose~~It is a very useful image, but limestone pavement is not correct. Charles (talk) 20:24, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] Support Charles (talk) 14:29, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] * Comment Charles is right the scope is inappropriate. Erosion by freezing of a limestone breccia could be an admissible scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:22, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:35, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] Comment - I think the scope is ungrammatical in English and should read as follows: "Erosion by freezing of a limestone breccia" -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:56, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] * Comment Ok now?--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:10, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] I think so (and I hope so). Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:45, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] Support A beautiful pebble that brings us together: a breccia! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)`[reply]