Review (criteria) |
- Comment It would be good to put the view orientation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It would be useful that this image is used. ~ Moheen (talk) 18:09, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for nominating this image. This is a valued architectural image. I support the nomination. --Nahid Hossain (talk) 00:51, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It would be good to put the view orientation --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nominating doesn't respond to comments. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:32, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Done View orientation.--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 13:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Ok for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:04, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Info Sorry. IMO, I do not want to count first support. Because, supporter was not careful about each of the six VI criteria. It seems to point of interest. ~ Moheen (talk) 16:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Useful. ~ Moheen (talk) 16:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
|