Oppose Per Archaeodontosaurus...it might be the best image we have in this scope, but it is not good; for me it fails criterion #3 ("Must illustrate its subject well"). cmadler (talk) 21:03, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment But it is the best photo in commons of this species, isn't it! Moreover, photographs with such a good quality are very desirable from the editors of the encyclopedia. Can we conclude that, actually this image is very valuable for the Wikipedia?--MrPanyGoff06:12, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
An image must meet all the VI criteria, which means that it must not only be the best on Commons, but must also illustrate the subject well. cmadler (talk) 16:32, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Examining the free resources encyclopedia I find this as above average representation, that's why I uploaded it. Maybe it is a good idea to stop uploading photographs in commons since they are so bad and useless. --MrPanyGoff09:10, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]