Commons:Valued image candidates/Papaver somniferum 01.JPG/Archive of previous reviews

• As picture doesn't show all plant, the scope should be more narrow. --Sfu (talk) 18:06, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment Scope would be changed into “Papaver somniferum flower” and I would support. Cultivated for opium or for makoć ? --B.navez (talk) 19:12, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
• I changed the scope to "Papaver somniferum flower" and status to supported (vide B.navez vote) --Lestat (talk) 08:02, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

   Comment I agree this is probably B.navez' intention to support, but I am not keen with nominators voting on behalf of reviewers and changing the status. I will contact B.navez and ask for confirmation. In the meantime I have changed the status back to nominated. It is not that I think you are acting in bad faith, it is just to avoid any future confusion about this nomination. ;-) -- Slaunger (talk) 19:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

•  Support as claimed above --B.navez (talk) 02:32, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support
=> Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 23:28, 6 September 2008 (UTC)