Commons:Valued image candidates/Paryż wieża 4 mod.jpg/Archive of previous reviews
Oppose
Neutral - Sorry, but for such a known subject as this one the phtographic quality becomes an important choice factor, and this image doesn't resist a comparison with the best available. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:49, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Comment You show best available. What are photo? Albertus teolog (talk) 17:10, 13 October 2008 (UTC)- Comment -- You almost have a point here, as the available photos of the Tour Eifell are not very good. But I found this one, which I believe has a better quality, despite the people in the foreground. Let's wait for other opinions!-- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:11, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Your proposal is also bad angle. Yours! Albertus teolog (talk) 20:31, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yes it is, your angle is better. Well, I'm changing my vote to "neutral" (for now) and wait for other opinions. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I went through the category and ended up hesitating between the two same photographs. I prefer the colours of the one proposed by Alvesgaspar, but the people in the foreground are distracting. Still thinking about it. --Eusebius (talk) 09:25, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comment In Poland of that proposal say: the prospect of frog :-) Albertus teolog (talk) 09:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- What? I don't get you. --Eusebius (talk) 10:00, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- I am talking about proposals Alvesgaspar. Albertus teolog (talk) 10:11, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Support I prefer this one. --Eusebius (talk) 14:53, 15 October 2008 (UTC)- Support Could be done better, but it is best in class and meets all criteria. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:31, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 1 neutral => Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:54, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
