Oppose Sorry, I do not think it is good illustration of the scope. There are at least three different figures as far as I can see from the available photos of the building. If you illustrate one figure as done here, that one has been given preference over the others. Moreover, I am in doubt if this is not a too narrow scope? Does the figures in themselves have a special notable meaning or are they best seen in the context of the facade? If they are notable, the scope should be even more specific pinpointing the exact figure this image is an illustration of. I also think "small" is an irrelevant word to use in the scope. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:56, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
