Review
(criteria) |
- The part between parentheses (like the rest of the scope) should not refer directly to wikimedia organization (article, category, etc). Rather, it should be either a subscope (probably unsuitable here, but I don't know), or some kind of precision (like a geographic precision, a city or a country). Here I guess it is intended to provide a bit of context for the name of the gun? Actually, would you care to explain what kind of refinement you intended to provide with the second link (between parentheses)? --Eusebius (talk) 18:54, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I might have misunderstood. To me, "scope" is "what the photograph is about", and since it's not a given that everybody knows all about it (I certainly do not), I link to the Wikipedia article. I understand that linking to the Commons category is convenient, but I'd have though the Wikipedia article was relevant. Rama (talk) 20:07, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not expecting everybody to know everything about VI habits, don't worry. Maybe you want to have a look at this guideline and propose another formatting? --Eusebius (talk) 20:36, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, the link to the en: article really had to go, then. Thank you. Rama (talk) 23:59, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- OK. Opposition removed. Maybe you want to consider "Sig Pro pistol" as well, in order to make the scope more immediately understandable. --Eusebius (talk) 04:33, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
