Commons:Valued image candidates/Volkswagen press conference, IAA 2017, Frankfurt (1Y7A2075).jpg

Volkswagen press conference, IAA 2017, Frankfurt (1Y7A2075).jpg

**promoted**
Image
Nominated by	MB-one (talk) on 2017-09-20 20:43 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Volkswagen I.D. Buzz - front
Used in	Global usage en:Volkswagen I.D. Buzz, fr:Volkswagen I.D. Buzz, wikidata:Q30765198, de:Konzeptfahrzeuge von VW
Review (criteria)	Comment There are special recommendations for the scopes of cars, for the orentions of the shots. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply] Question @Archaeodontosaurus: Could you provide a link to the page, where I can find that information? Can't find anything on Commons:Valued image scope about that. --MB-one (talk) 06:55, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply] Comment You're right, I thought we'd added them. Ask our expert for cars We will ask the question to our expert for cars : @DeFacto: . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Archaeodontosaurus (talk • contribs) 08:07, 21 September 2017‎ (UTC)[reply] Comment, I'm no car expert, but I do have an interest in some of them. ;) We did discuss car scopes some time back here, but never reached a formal consensus. However, we do seem to have a working agreement that each visually distinctive car make/model/generation can generally have two scopes - one for a front 3/4 view (front) and one for a rear 3/4 view (rear). So this image could have scope: Volkswagen ID Buzz - front. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:45, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply] They had it on English Wiki, querter shot was one of them, like this, not bad pic. But i dont remember for other requests. --Mile (talk) 13:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC) p.S. Some crop from left might enfocus it better[reply] ---- Scope changed from Volkswagen I.D. Buzz to Volkswagen I.D. Buzz - front --MB-one (talk) 15:59, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply] Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn". Comment One last detail: it lacks a geocoding in the caption and everything will be perfect. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:51, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply] @Archaeodontosaurus: Done and thanks. --MB-one (talk) 12:50, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply] Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:55, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply] Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 15:07, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 26 September 2017 (UTC)`[reply]