| Subpage for Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 organizers.
|
 | For transparency, it is mandatory for national organizers to publish their jury rounds and respective jurors at the earliest possible, ideally before the jury begins. Please see the example below. Also, you don't need to publish all the rounds at once - it can be updated as things progress. |
|
EXAMPLE
==COUNTRY NAME==
* Jury organizer/coordinator: USERNAME
===ROUND 1===
*Purpose: Intial filtration
*Jurors:
:*Username 1
:*Username 2
:*Username 3
===ROUND 2===
*Purpose: To decide the top 100
*Jurors:
:*Username 1
:*Username 2
:*Username 3
===ROUND 3 (FINAL)===
*Purpose: To decide the top 15
*Jurors:
:*Username 1
:*Username 2
|
Pre-selection round
edit
- Purpose: Intial filtration
- Number of images: 1926
- Type of round: Yes/No
- Criteria: Receive a "Yes" from at least 1 judge
- Notes: Images contributed by the judges do not participate in any selection.
- Petscan of the selection: --
- Start: 01 October 2022
- End: 31 October 2022
- Jurors:
Pre-selection round
edit
- Purpose: Initial filtration to minimize the number of photos to the final jury
- Number of images: 8465
- Type of round: Yes/No
- Criteria: Receive a "Yes" from at least 1 judge
- Notes: Images contributed by the judges do not participate in any selection.
- Petscan of the selection: https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?psid=23021877
- Start: 2022-10-01
- End: 2022-10-04
- Jurors:
- Purpose: Filtration of the images that should go to the nest round. Minimize the number of images
- Number of images: 2395
- Type of round: Yes/No
- Criteria: Receive a "Yes" from at least one judge
- Notes: This round included all images that received at least 1 "Yes" on the pre-selection round
- Petscan of the selection: https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?psid=22965505
- Start: 2022-10-05
- End: 2022-10-12
- Jurors:
- Purpose: Evaluate the images under the criteria of beauty, technical quality and visual/social impact of the image and/or the monument depicted.
- Number of images: 1668
- Type of round: Rating
- Criteria:
- Receive an average (3 judges) score of 7.5; or
- Receive an average (3 judges) score of 5.0 if the number of files is too low
- Purpose: Evaluate the best images under the criteria of beauty, technical quality and visual/social impact of the image and/or the monument depicted.
- Number of images: 96
- Type of round: Ranking
- Criteria: List of the 96 images with the lowest score, defined by the mean of the position numbers of the images in the ranking sheet of each judge (6 judges)
- Notes: This round included all images that received an score of 13 stars combined (3 judges) on round 2
- Petscan of the selection: https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?psid=23068602
- Start: 2022-10-19
- End: 2022-10-24
- Jurors:
- Purpose: Choose 10 images for the international jury; Choose the best image from Espírito Santo; Evaluate the best images under the diversity of photographers and images;
- Number of images: 96
- Type of round: Ranking
- Criteria:
- 10 images with the lowest score (meaning they are in the top 10), defined by the mean of the position numbers of the images in the ranking sheet of each judge (6 judges), considering the diversity of monuments in all 10, and diversity of photographers in the top 5 (the ones that received a prize);
- 1 image with the lowest score, defined by the mean of the position numbers of the images in the ranking sheet of each judge (6 judges), considering the background of the monuments and the context of the photographs.
expected Period: 2022-09-01 until 2022-10-16
- Purpose: Initial filtration, checking for lower quality and ineligible pictures
- Jurors:
- Purpose: To decide the top 100
- Jurors:
ROUND 3 (FINAL)
edit
- Purpose: To decide the top 15
- Jurors:
Round 1: Pre-selection
edit
- Purpose: Initial screening to reduce the number of photos going to the final jury
- Number of images: 26379
- Type of round: Yes/No
- Criteria: Receive a "Yes" from at least 2 jurors
- Start: 2022-10-01
- End: 2022-11-01
- Jurors:
Round 2: Selection of short-list
edit
- Purpose: Narrow down the list of potential winners
- Number of images: 1664
- Type of round: Grading (1-5)
- Criteria: images with the grade of 0.6 or higher are selected for the short-list
- Notes: Images contributed by the jurors are manually removed after the grading
- Start: 2022-11-01
- End: 2022-11-15
- Jurors:
Round 3: Selection of winners
edit
- Purpose: select 10 winners
- Number of images: 238
- Type of round: ranking (discussion)
- Criteria: each juror selects 20 best images from the short-list, then the whole jury reaches consensus on the top-10
- Notes: this round is done via an e-mail discussion (logs available)
- Start: 2022-11-16
- End: 2022-12-04
- Jurors:
- Purpose: Intial filtration
- Jurors:
- Purpose: Evaluate the best images under the criteria of beauty, technical quality etc.
- Jurors:
- Stephen Fokké, directeur Stichting Gebouwd Erfgoed Suriname (SGES)
- Satya Singh, architect en lid van de Bouwcommissie
- Rudi Moeridjan, fotograaf en oud-bestuurslid van de Surinaamse fotografen vereniging (Sufov)
ROUND 3 (FINAL)
edit
- Purpose: To decide the international top 10 and top 3 national prize winners
- Jurors:
- Stephen Fokké, directeur Stichting Gebouwd Erfgoed Suriname (SGES)
- Satya Singh, architect en lid van de Bouwcommissie
- Rudi Moeridjan, fotograaf en oud-bestuurslid van de Surinaamse fotografen vereniging (Sufov)
Yes/No to get the number of images down before voting. All images viewed by two jurors and only images with two yes votes moves on.
Rating to get the number of images down before ranking. Remaining images rated by all jurors. Cut off decided somewhere around 25 images where the score allows.
Ranking to decide on top three and shared 4th moving on to the international finale. If images end up with the same score for top three or making it to the international finale previous rounds decide the outcome.
- Jury organizer/coordinator: NHC
- Purpose: Initial filtration, weeding out non-compliant and low-quality works.
- Jurors:
ROUND 2 (FINAL)
edit
- Purpose: Determine the top three winning works to compete in the international finale, select winning works from four to ten places, and some excellent works.
- Jurors:
- Chao-Huang Huang, Cultural Asset Building Research Specialist
- Kai-Hsing Huan, Photographer, photography art education expert
- Tsai, Pei Kuei, National Kaohsiung Normal University Graduate Institute of Transdisciplinary Art Director, Renowned curator and art critic, Kaohsiung Prize jury
- Zhuang,Sheng-Huang, Gangshan Military Dependents' Village Executive Secretary
- Reke
