File:Assessment-of-Metagenomic-Assembly-Using-Simulated-Next-Generation-Sequencing-Data-pone.0031386.g001.jpg
Assessment-of-Metagenomic-Assembly-Using-Simulated-Next-Generation-Sequencing-Data-pone.0031386.g001.jpg (662 × 159 pixels, file size: 59 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary edit
DescriptionAssessment-of-Metagenomic-Assembly-Using-Simulated-Next-Generation-Sequencing-Data-pone.0031386.g001.jpg |
English: Contig length histograms illustrate the number of contigs within a certain size fraction for assemblies of Illumina reads with quality filtering (red) and without quality filtering (purple). Contig lengths were compared for assemblies of different community complexities (10 genomes, 100 genomes, 400 genomes). Only contigs greater than 500 bp are shown, the x-axis is log scale. There was a strong improvement in the assemblies with pre-assembly quality control of the reads. |
|
Date | ||
Source | Image file from Mende D, Waller A, Sunagawa S, Järvelin A, Chan M, Arumugam M, Raes J, Bork P (2012). "Assessment of Metagenomic Assembly Using Simulated Next Generation Sequencing Data". PLOS ONE. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0031386. PMID 22384016. PMC: 3285633. | |
Author | Mende D, Waller A, Sunagawa S, Järvelin A, Chan M, Arumugam M, Raes J, Bork P | |
Permission (Reusing this file) |
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.
|
|
Provenance InfoField |
|
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 21:55, 11 October 2014 | 662 × 159 (59 KB) | Recitation-bot (talk | contribs) | Automatic upload of media from: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031386 |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
IIM version | 2 |
---|