File:Bodycam Footage of LAPD Officers Shooting Knife-Wielding Man.webm

Original file(WebM audio/video file, VP9/Opus, length 2 min 52 s, 1,920 × 1,080 pixels, 1.66 Mbps overall, file size: 34.09 MB)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary edit

Description
English: On June 20, 2018, around 10:39 p.m., Devonshire Patrol Division uniformed officers responded to an ambulance cutting radio call at a residence in the 20000 block of Sardinia Way in Porter Ranch. The comments of the call indicated that a female victim was outside and had been stabbed by her husband. As the officers arrived, they observed the victim on the ground, surrounded by community members who were providing her with aid. The officers' attention was then drawn to a male suspect, later identified as Alen Alpanian, who was standing outside the front door of the residence holding a kitchen type knife. The officers ordered Alpanian to drop the knife; however, he walked away from the front door of the residence toward the officers, still holding the large kitchen knife. The officers continued to give commands to Alpanian to drop the knife, but he failed to comply and began to cross the street toward the officers. The officers deployed two Bean Bag shotguns, followed by two TASER activations, which proved to be ineffective. Alpanian continued to walk toward the officers while holding the knife, which resulted in an Officer-Involved Shooting. Alpanian was struck by gunfire and transported to a local hospital, where he was treated and listed in stable condition. The female victim was also transported to a local hospital, underwent surgery for her stab wounds and was also listed in critical yet stable condition. No officers were injured during the incident and an 8" kitchen knife was recovered at scene. Force Investigation Division detectives responded to the scene to handle the administrative and criminal investigations. The complete investigation will be reviewed by the Chief of Police and the Board of Police Commissioners and the Office of the Inspector General to determine the thoroughness and accuracy of the investigation and whether the use of deadly force complied with LAPD's policies and procedures. Additionally, representatives from the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office who responded to the scene will review the subsequent FID investigation; evidence collected and witness statements to determine if the force used by the officers(s) was reasonable.
Date
Source YouTube: Bodycam Footage of LAPD Officers Shooting Knife-Wielding Man – View/save archived versions on archive.org and archive.today
Author LAPD.

Licensing edit

Public domain This file is a work of a Los Angeles Police Department officer or employee, taken or made as part of that person's official duties. As a work of a Californian government agency (either state or local) that was not created by an agency which state law has allowed to claim copyright, the file is in the public domain in the United States.
Records subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act

Pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code § 6250 et seq.) "Public records" include "any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public’s business prepared, owned, used, or retained by any state or local agency regardless of physical form or characteristics." (Cal. Gov't. Code § 6252(e).) notes that "[a]ll public records are subject to disclosure unless the Public Records Act expressly provides otherwise." County of Santa Clara v. CFAC California Government Code § 6254 lists categories of documents not subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. In addition, computer software is not considered a public record, while data and statistics collected (whether collected knowingly or unknowingly) by a government authority whose powers derive from the laws of California are public records (such as license plate reader images) pursuant to EFF & ACLU of Southern California v. Los Angeles Police Department & Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and are not exempt from disclosure and are public records.

Although the act only covers “writing,” the Act, pursuant to Government Code § 6252(g), states: “Writing” means any handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostating, photographing, photocopying, transmitting by electronic mail or facsimile, and every other means of recording upon any tangible thing any form of communication or representation, including letters, words, pictures, sounds, or symbols, or combinations thereof, and any record thereby created, regardless of the manner in which the record has been stored.

Agencies permitted to claim copyright

California's Constitution and its statutes do not permit any agency to claim copyright for "public records" unless authorized to do so by law. The following agencies are permitted to claim copyright and any works of these agencies should be assumed to be copyrighted outside of the United States without clear evidence to the contrary:

County of Santa Clara v. CFAC held that the State of California, or any government entity which derives its power from the State, cannot enforce a copyright in any record subject to the Public Records Act in the absence of another state statute giving it the authority to do so.
Note: Works that are considered "public records" but were not created by a state or municipal government agency may be copyrighted by their author; the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution prevents state law from overriding the author's right to copyright protection that is granted by federal law. For example, a state agency may post images online of the final appearance of a building under construction; while the images may have to be released by such agency since they are public records, their creator (eg. architecture/construction firm) retains copyright rights to the image unless the contract with the agency says otherwise. See: Government-in-the-Sunshine Manual: To what extent does federal law preempt state law regarding public inspection of records?.

Disclaimer: The information provided, especially the list of agencies permitted to claim copyright, may not be complete. Wikimedia Commons makes no guarantee of the adequacy or validity of this information in this template (see disclaimer).

Public domain

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current15:29, 20 May 20232 min 52 s, 1,920 × 1,080 (34.09 MB)Illegitimate Barrister (talk | contribs)Imported media from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31PFcm_TJ6E

The following page uses this file:

Transcode status

Update transcode status
Format Bitrate Download Status Encode time
VP9 1080P 1.6 Mbps Completed 16:18, 20 May 2023 47 min 53 s
Streaming 1080p (VP9) 1.5 Mbps Completed 02:07, 31 January 2024 2.0 s
VP9 720P 969 kbps Completed 16:05, 20 May 2023 34 min 59 s
Streaming 720p (VP9) 868 kbps Completed 23:03, 5 February 2024 2.0 s
VP9 480P 626 kbps Completed 18:22, 20 May 2023 3 min 11 s
Streaming 480p (VP9) 525 kbps Completed 08:57, 12 January 2024 1.0 s
VP9 360P 421 kbps Completed 18:31, 20 May 2023 12 min 45 s
Streaming 360p (VP9) 320 kbps Completed 04:05, 17 January 2024 2.0 s
VP9 240P 294 kbps Completed 18:18, 20 May 2023 1 min 49 s
Streaming 240p (VP9) 194 kbps Completed 05:00, 16 December 2023 1.0 s
WebM 360P 587 kbps Completed 18:20, 20 May 2023 1 min 27 s
Streaming 144p (MJPEG) 997 kbps Completed 05:08, 1 November 2023 14 s
Stereo (Opus) 100 kbps Completed 09:15, 16 November 2023 4.0 s
Stereo (MP3) 128 kbps Completed 11:45, 30 October 2023 8.0 s

Metadata