File:Google, Facebook and the future of Journalism post "the Donald fake news Trump" (33551572155).jpg
![File:Google, Facebook and the future of Journalism post "the Donald fake news Trump" (33551572155).jpg](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a2/Google%2C_Facebook_and_the_future_of_Journalism_post_%22the_Donald_fake_news_Trump%22_%2833551572155%29.jpg/450px-Google%2C_Facebook_and_the_future_of_Journalism_post_%22the_Donald_fake_news_Trump%22_%2833551572155%29.jpg?20180730180113)
Original file (3,648 × 4,864 pixels, file size: 3.61 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Captions
Summary
editDescriptionGoogle, Facebook and the future of Journalism post "the Donald fake news Trump" (33551572155).jpg |
<a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump" rel="nofollow">twitter.com/realDonaldTrump</a> Jan. 18, 2018 Facebook unveiled major changes Friday to the News Feed of its 2 billion users, announcing it will rank news organizations by credibility based on user feedback and diminish its role as an arbiter of the news people see. More than two-thirds of Americans now get some of their news from social media, according to Pew Research Center. That shift has empowered Facebook and Google, putting them in an uncomfortable position of deciding what news they should distribute to their global audiences. But it also has led to questions about whether these corporations should be considered media companies. <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/01/19/facebook-will-now-ask-its-users-to-rank-news-organizations-they-trust/" rel="nofollow">www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/01/19/face...</a> The Economist | Just the two of them IN LATE 2017 Google and Facebook made changes to help support the news organisations that provide them content. Facebook began displaying the logos of publishers in some of its posts, so readers can identify the news source. And Google for the first time gave publishers the ability to control how many times the search engine’s users can visit news sites free of charge. Both will directly help papers to sell subscriptions. "That the tech giants are making concessions on some of these points may be because they sense that the political mood is turning against them in America and in Europe, or because of genuine concern for the media ecosystem. Several newspaper executives say Google’s dealings with them seemed more sincere than Facebook’s. But both firms’ changes to click-through policies are significant. But selling digital ads on their own websites is a challenge for most news organisations, in part because of the competition from the duopoly. Facebook and Alphabet [parent of google and youTube] will take the majority of all digital-ad revenue globally this year, and, by some measures, have recently taken 80-90% of the growth in such revenue. Their data on users’ browsing activities give them a huge advantage in micro-targeting users. Wherever journalism turns, Facebook and Google loom large. Their recent moves, although welcome to many publishers, are unlikely to alter the trajectory of the relationship." <a href="https://www.economist.com/news/business/21731194-new-concessions-social-media-firms-are-unlikely-help-publishers-much-publishers-are?frsc=dg%7Ce" rel="nofollow">www.economist.com/news/business/21731194-new-concessions-...</a> |
Date | |
Source | Google, Facebook and the future of Journalism post "the Donald fake news Trump" |
Author | Carnaval.com Studios from The Inner Mission San Francisco, Earth |
Licensing
edit![w:en:Creative Commons](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/CC_some_rights_reserved.svg/90px-CC_some_rights_reserved.svg.png)
![attribution](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/24px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
![]() |
This image was originally posted to Flickr by sfmission.com at https://flickr.com/photos/17281186@N00/33551572155 (archive). It was reviewed on 30 July 2018 by FlickreviewR 2 and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-2.0. |
30 July 2018
![]()
|
According to article 27 of the Copyright Act (en/de/fr/it), works installed at or on publicly accessible places or ground may be pictured, and such pictures may be offered for sale, sold, transmitted, or otherwise published. The image must not be three-dimensional and it must not be possible to use the picture for the same purpose as the original.
The works must be permanently installed, but for the purposes of the law, "permanent" means a fixed installation which may be temporary -- time limited -- but not "accidental", e.g. due to transport of the work. For more information, see COM:CRT/Switzerland#Freedom of panorama.Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ sicilianu ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ Nederlands ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ +/− |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 18:01, 30 July 2018 | ![]() | 3,648 × 4,864 (3.61 MB) | SteinsplitterBot (talk | contribs) | Bot: Image rotated by 270° (EXIF-Orientation set from 6 to 1, rotated 0°) |
15:30, 30 July 2018 | ![]() | 4,864 × 3,648 (3.62 MB) | A1Cafel (talk | contribs) | Transferred from Flickr via #flickr2commons |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | Canon |
---|---|
Camera model | Canon PowerShot G3 X |
Exposure time | 1/320 sec (0.003125) |
F-number | f/4 |
ISO speed rating | 125 |
Date and time of data generation | 23:51, 6 March 2017 |
Lens focal length | 8.8 mm |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 180 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 180 dpi |
File change date and time | 23:51, 6 March 2017 |
Y and C positioning | Co-sited |
Exif version | 2.3 |
Date and time of digitizing | 23:51, 6 March 2017 |
Meaning of each component |
|
Image compression mode | 3 |
APEX shutter speed | 8.3125 |
APEX aperture | 4 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 2.96875 APEX (f/2.8) |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |
DateTime subseconds | 31 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 31 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 31 |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
Focal plane X resolution | 10,584.13926499 |
Focal plane Y resolution | 10,573.913043478 |
Focal plane resolution unit | inches |
Sensing method | One-chip color area sensor |
File source | Digital still camera |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Digital zoom ratio | 1 |
Scene capture type | Standard |
GPS tag version | 0.0.3.2 |
Rating (out of 5) | 0 |