File:Google, Facebook and the future of Journalism post "the Donald fake news Trump" (33551572155).jpg

Original file(3,648 × 4,864 pixels, file size: 3.61 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

edit
Description

<a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump" rel="nofollow">twitter.com/realDonaldTrump</a>

Jan. 18, 2018 Facebook unveiled major changes Friday to the News Feed of its 2 billion users, announcing it will rank news organizations by credibility based on user feedback and diminish its role as an arbiter of the news people see. More than two-thirds of Americans now get some of their news from social media, according to Pew Research Center. That shift has empowered Facebook and Google, putting them in an uncomfortable position of deciding what news they should distribute to their global audiences. But it also has led to questions about whether these corporations should be considered media companies. <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/01/19/facebook-will-now-ask-its-users-to-rank-news-organizations-they-trust/" rel="nofollow">www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/01/19/face...</a>

The Economist | Just the two of them IN LATE 2017 Google and Facebook made changes to help support the news organisations that provide them content. Facebook began displaying the logos of publishers in some of its posts, so readers can identify the news source. And Google for the first time gave publishers the ability to control how many times the search engine’s users can visit news sites free of charge. Both will directly help papers to sell subscriptions.

"That the tech giants are making concessions on some of these points may be because they sense that the political mood is turning against them in America and in Europe, or because of genuine concern for the media ecosystem. Several newspaper executives say Google’s dealings with them seemed more sincere than Facebook’s. But both firms’ changes to click-through policies are significant. But selling digital ads on their own websites is a challenge for most news organisations, in part because of the competition from the duopoly. Facebook and Alphabet [parent of google and youTube] will take the majority of all digital-ad revenue globally this year, and, by some measures, have recently taken 80-90% of the growth in such revenue. Their data on users’ browsing activities give them a huge advantage in micro-targeting users. Wherever journalism turns, Facebook and Google loom large. Their recent moves, although welcome to many publishers, are unlikely to alter the trajectory of the relationship."

<a href="https://www.economist.com/news/business/21731194-new-concessions-social-media-firms-are-unlikely-help-publishers-much-publishers-are?frsc=dg%7Ce" rel="nofollow">www.economist.com/news/business/21731194-new-concessions-...</a>
Date
Source Google, Facebook and the future of Journalism post "the Donald fake news Trump"
Author Carnaval.com Studios from The Inner Mission San Francisco, Earth

Licensing

edit
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by sfmission.com at https://flickr.com/photos/17281186@N00/33551572155 (archive). It was reviewed on 30 July 2018 by FlickreviewR 2 and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-2.0.

30 July 2018

Switzerland

According to article 27 of the Copyright Act (en/de/fr/it), works installed at or on publicly accessible places or ground may be pictured, and such pictures may be offered for sale, sold, transmitted, or otherwise published. The image must not be three-dimensional and it must not be possible to use the picture for the same purpose as the original.

The works must be permanently installed, but for the purposes of the law, "permanent" means a fixed installation which may be temporary -- time limited -- but not "accidental", e.g. due to transport of the work.

For more information, see COM:CRT/Switzerland#Freedom of panorama.

Deutsch  English  español  sicilianu  македонски  русский  Nederlands  français  italiano  +/−

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current18:01, 30 July 2018Thumbnail for version as of 18:01, 30 July 20183,648 × 4,864 (3.61 MB)SteinsplitterBot (talk | contribs)Bot: Image rotated by 270° (EXIF-Orientation set from 6 to 1, rotated 0°)
15:30, 30 July 2018Thumbnail for version as of 15:30, 30 July 20184,864 × 3,648 (3.62 MB)A1Cafel (talk | contribs)Transferred from Flickr via #flickr2commons

There are no pages that use this file.

Metadata