File:LAPD Cop Shoots Stabbing Suspect Who Charges At Him With a Knife.webm

Original file(WebM audio/video file, VP9/Opus, length 10 min 56 s, 1,920 × 1,080 pixels, 2.36 Mbps overall, file size: 184.4 MB)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary edit

Description
English: Los Angeles, California — On May 2, 2023, around 9:40 a.m., uniformed officers working a Transit Services Division detail at the Redline Metro Station located at Vermont Avenue and Beverly Boulevard were approached by Victim No. 1, an 18-year-old, male, Hispanic, who informed the officers a suspect, later identified as 23-year-old Mason Todd Swenor, had brandished a knife at him. Victim No. 1, showed the officers a photograph of Swenor on his cell phone and directed the officers to Swenor’s location. The officers’ proceeded up to the lower-level mezzanine, where they observed Swenor who was also in possession of a knife.

The officers made contact with Swenor and repeatedly ordered him to drop the knife, however, Swenor failed to comply with the officers’ commands. Swenor fled to the upper-level mezzanine, where he approached Victim No. 2, a 74-year-old, female, Hispanic and struck her in the head with an unknown object. The officers continued to pursue Swenor up to the street level. Swenor continued north on Vermont Avenue from Beverly Boulevard and while on the sidewalk, Swenor stabbed Victim No. 3, a 61-year-old, male, Hispanic, on his left shoulder.

As Swenor continued to flee and ran across the street into the rear parking lot of the building located near the 300 Block of N. Vermont Avenue. Swenor positioned himself in front of a parked vehicle, while still in possession of the knife. The officers pursued Swenor to the parking lot and positioned themselves at the rear of the vehicle. The officers continued to give commands ordering Swenor to drop the knife, however, he refused to comply. With the knife in his hand, Swenor charged at one of the officers resulting in an officer involved shooting. Swenor was struck by the officers’ gunfire; he fell to the ground and dropped the knife. Swenor was taken into custody without further incident.

Swenor was transported to a local hospital where he is being treated for his injuries. Swenor is listed in critical, but stable condition. Victim No. 1 was not injured during this incident. Victim No. 2 received medical treatment at a hospital and was released. Victim No. 3 was hospitalized for a laceration and is in stable condition. Swenor is a resident of Glendale, AZ and he was booked for 664/187(A) – Attempted Murder (Booking No. 6597136). His bail was set at $2,125,000.00.


Timestamps:

  • 0:56 - Bodycam: Officer #1
  • 4:14 - Bodycam: Officer #2
  • 9:40 - Dashcam Footage
Date
Source YouTube: LAPD Cop Shoots Stabbing Suspect Who Charges At Him With a Knife – View/save archived versions on archive.org and archive.today
Author LAPD

Licensing edit

Public domain This file is a work of a Los Angeles Police Department officer or employee, taken or made as part of that person's official duties. As a work of a Californian government agency (either state or local) that was not created by an agency which state law has allowed to claim copyright, the file is in the public domain in the United States.
Records subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act

Pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code § 6250 et seq.) "Public records" include "any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public’s business prepared, owned, used, or retained by any state or local agency regardless of physical form or characteristics." (Cal. Gov't. Code § 6252(e).) notes that "[a]ll public records are subject to disclosure unless the Public Records Act expressly provides otherwise." County of Santa Clara v. CFAC California Government Code § 6254 lists categories of documents not subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. In addition, computer software is not considered a public record, while data and statistics collected (whether collected knowingly or unknowingly) by a government authority whose powers derive from the laws of California are public records (such as license plate reader images) pursuant to EFF & ACLU of Southern California v. Los Angeles Police Department & Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and are not exempt from disclosure and are public records.

Although the act only covers “writing,” the Act, pursuant to Government Code § 6252(g), states: “Writing” means any handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostating, photographing, photocopying, transmitting by electronic mail or facsimile, and every other means of recording upon any tangible thing any form of communication or representation, including letters, words, pictures, sounds, or symbols, or combinations thereof, and any record thereby created, regardless of the manner in which the record has been stored.

Agencies permitted to claim copyright

California's Constitution and its statutes do not permit any agency to claim copyright for "public records" unless authorized to do so by law. The following agencies are permitted to claim copyright and any works of these agencies should be assumed to be copyrighted outside of the United States without clear evidence to the contrary:

County of Santa Clara v. CFAC held that the State of California, or any government entity which derives its power from the State, cannot enforce a copyright in any record subject to the Public Records Act in the absence of another state statute giving it the authority to do so.
Note: Works that are considered "public records" but were not created by a state or municipal government agency may be copyrighted by their author; the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution prevents state law from overriding the author's right to copyright protection that is granted by federal law. For example, a state agency may post images online of the final appearance of a building under construction; while the images may have to be released by such agency since they are public records, their creator (eg. architecture/construction firm) retains copyright rights to the image unless the contract with the agency says otherwise. See: Government-in-the-Sunshine Manual: To what extent does federal law preempt state law regarding public inspection of records?.

Disclaimer: The information provided, especially the list of agencies permitted to claim copyright, may not be complete. Wikimedia Commons makes no guarantee of the adequacy or validity of this information in this template (see disclaimer).

Public domain

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current03:45, 3 June 202310 min 56 s, 1,920 × 1,080 (184.4 MB)Illegitimate Barrister (talk | contribs)Imported media from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xabBUDzNus

The following page uses this file:

Transcode status

Update transcode status
Format Bitrate Download Status Encode time
VP9 1080P 4.64 Mbps Completed 04:25, 3 June 2023 40 min 22 s
Streaming 1080p (VP9) 4.56 Mbps Completed 22:48, 14 March 2024 21 s
VP9 720P 2.51 Mbps Completed 04:18, 3 June 2023 33 min 12 s
Streaming 720p (VP9) Not ready Unknown status
VP9 480P 1.32 Mbps Completed 04:14, 3 June 2023 21 min 20 s
Streaming 480p (VP9) Not ready Unknown status
VP9 360P 707 kbps Completed 04:05, 3 June 2023 13 min 44 s
Streaming 360p (VP9) Not ready Unknown status
VP9 240P 401 kbps Completed 04:04, 3 June 2023 14 min 29 s
Streaming 240p (VP9) 316 kbps Completed 07:06, 13 January 2024 4.0 s
WebM 360P 547 kbps Completed 03:59, 3 June 2023 7 min 6 s
Streaming 144p (MJPEG) 1 Mbps Completed 18:34, 8 November 2023 1 min 5 s
Stereo (Opus) 84 kbps Completed 18:15, 8 November 2023 11 s
Stereo (MP3) 128 kbps Completed 18:17, 8 November 2023 23 s

Metadata