File:Liesegang banding in quartzite (Baraboo Quartzite, upper Paleoproterozoic, ~1.7 Ga; Tumbled Rocks Trail, Devil's Lake State Park, Wisconsin, USA) 5 (18817143442).jpg
Original file (4,000 × 3,000 pixels, file size: 5.63 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary edit
DescriptionLiesegang banding in quartzite (Baraboo Quartzite, upper Paleoproterozoic, ~1.7 Ga; Tumbled Rocks Trail, Devil's Lake State Park, Wisconsin, USA) 5 (18817143442).jpg |
Liesegang banding in quartzite in the Precambrian of Wisconsin, USA. The Baraboo Ranges of southern Wisconsin are dominated by a hard, erosion-resistant Precambrian metamorphic unit called the Baraboo Quartzite. These rocks were originally marine sandstones and have been subjected to metamorphism and structural folding. Original sedimentary structures are preserved, such as cross-bedding and ripple marks. Baraboo Quartzites vary in color from pinkish to dark reddish to grayish. During metamorphism, quartz overgrowths formed over the original quartz sand grains. Long-term, modern weathering can result in original sand grains being released. This unit has economic significance - it has been quarried historically and in modern times. The quartzite is broken down into gravel-sized pieces for use as railroad ballast and erosion-control rip-rap. The lines, or "layers", in the quartzite shown above do not represent sedimentary bedding or lamination or any other sedimentary structures. This thin, closely-spaced banding is called "Liesegang banding". It usually occurs as irregular, reddish or brownish or orangish-brown iron oxide banding in porous rocks, particularly sandstones and pebbly sandstones. These features are almost universally referred to as “Liesegang banding”, representing precipitation lines of iron-rich minerals (e.g., hematite, limonite, goethite, etc.) at & along groundwater chemical interfaces. However, according to Neil Wells of Kent State University, the original concept of Liesegang banding (Liesegang, 1896) does not match up with what is seen in the rock record (see Wells et al., 2003). True Liesegang banding refers to parallel bands of precipitate formed by diffusion along a single chemical gradient during one event. What's seen in the rock record often consists of sets of irregularly concentric iron bands, with different sets of bands quite frequently oriented in different directions, and showing cross-cutting and dissolution of older sets. Iron oxide banding in the rock record is clearly the result of numerous precipitation events over long periods of time by moving groundwater (Wells et al., 2003). Iron oxide mineralization along these bands appears to be induced by the presence of either a redox interface (change from reducing to oxidizing conditions in the groundwater) or a pH interface (change in acidity). Because Neil Wells is the first (apparently) to point out that what geologists have been calling Liesegang banding really isn’t, a renaming seems to be in order. It was jokingly suggested in 2003 that the iron banding discussed above be called “Wells Banding”. I’m all for that. The "Liesegang banding" seen above is unusual in that it is in quartzite, a hard, tight, non-porous metamorphic rock. Before metamorphism, the quartzite was sandstone. The banding was acquired before alteration to quartzite. Stratigraphy: Baraboo Quartzite, upper Paleoproterozoic, ~1.7 Ga Locality: Tumbled Rocks Trail, northwestern margin of Devil's Lake, Devil's Lake State Park, northern part of the South Range of the Baraboo Ranges, southeast of the town of Baraboo, eastern Sauk County, southern Wisconsin, USA (43° 25' 34.34" North, 89° 44' 06.56" West) References cited: Liesegang, R.E. 1896. Ueber einige Eigenschaften von Gal-lerten [On some properties of gelatin]. Naturwissenschaftliche Wochenschrift 11: 353-362. (see also: Liesegang, R.E. 1945. Geologische Bänderungen durch Diffusion und Kapillarität [Geologic banding by diffusion and capillarity]. Chemie der Erde, Zeitschrift der Chemischen, Mineralogie, Petrographie, Geologie und Bodenkunde 15: 420-423.) Wells, N.A., D.A. Waugh & A.M. Foos. 2003. Some notes and hypotheses concerning iron and iron remobilization features in the Sharon Formation (Summit County, Ohio). in Pennsylvanian Sharon Formation, past and present: sedimentology, hydrogeology, and historical and environmental significance, a field guide to Gorge Metro Park, Virginia Kendall Ledges in the Cuyahoga Valley National Park, and other sites in northeast Ohio. Ohio Division of Geological Survey Guidebook 18: 33-37. |
Date | |
Source | Liesegang banding in quartzite (Baraboo Quartzite, upper Paleoproterozoic, ~1.7 Ga; Tumbled Rocks Trail, Devil's Lake State Park, Wisconsin, USA) 5 |
Author | James St. John |
Licensing edit
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by James St. John at https://flickr.com/photos/47445767@N05/18817143442 (archive). It was reviewed on 22 October 2019 by FlickreviewR 2 and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-2.0. |
22 October 2019
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 05:45, 22 October 2019 | 4,000 × 3,000 (5.63 MB) | Rudolphous (talk | contribs) | Transferred from Flickr via #flickr2commons |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | Canon |
---|---|
Camera model | Canon PowerShot D10 |
Exposure time | 1/400 sec (0.0025) |
F-number | f/3.2 |
ISO speed rating | 80 |
Date and time of data generation | 14:10, 3 June 2015 |
Lens focal length | 7.23 mm |
Image title | |
Width | 4,000 px |
Height | 3,000 px |
Bits per component |
|
Pixel composition | RGB |
Orientation | Normal |
Number of components | 3 |
Horizontal resolution | 180 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 180 dpi |
Software used | Adobe Photoshop Elements 13.0 (Macintosh) |
File change date and time | 00:54, 15 June 2015 |
Y and C positioning | Co-sited |
Exif version | 2.21 |
Date and time of digitizing | 14:10, 3 June 2015 |
Meaning of each component |
|
Image compression mode | 3 |
APEX shutter speed | 8.65625 |
APEX aperture | 3.34375 |
APEX exposure bias | −0.33333333333333 |
Maximum land aperture | 3.34375 APEX (f/3.19) |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
Focal plane X resolution | 16,460.905349794 |
Focal plane Y resolution | 16,483.516483516 |
Focal plane resolution unit | inches |
Sensing method | One-chip color area sensor |
File source | Digital still camera |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Manual exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Digital zoom ratio | 1 |
Scene capture type | Landscape |
Lens used | 6.2-18.6 mm |
Date metadata was last modified | 20:54, 14 June 2015 |
Unique ID of original document | 60A93987ED4A35F56B42322AC01A4A03 |