File:Peter Vandermeersch - Marcel Gelauf.jpg
Size of this preview: 571 × 599 pixels. Other resolutions: 229 × 240 pixels | 457 × 480 pixels | 731 × 768 pixels | 1,143 × 1,200 pixels.
Original file (1,143 × 1,200 pixels, file size: 1.04 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
File information
Structured data
Captions
DescriptionPeter Vandermeersch - Marcel Gelauf.jpg |
- Peter Vandermeersch (NRC Handelsblad) - Marcel Gelauff (NOS Nieuws) verslag: http://www.denieuwereporter.nl/2011/09/debat-tussen-hoofdredacteuren-het-gaat-wel-oke-met-de-journalistiek www.denieuwereporter.nl/2011/09/debat-tussen-hoofdredacte...] |
||
Date | |||
Source | Flickr: Hoofdredacteuren debat @ Nieuwpoort | ||
Author | Marco Raaphorst | ||
Permission (Reusing this file) |
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.
|
This file has been extracted from another file : Hoofdredacteurendebat @ Nieuwspoort.jpg |
This is a retouched picture, which means that it has been digitally altered from its original version. Modifications: cropped. The original can be viewed here: Hoofdredacteurendebat @ Nieuwspoort.jpg: . Modifications made by 1Veertje.
|
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 14:21, 13 August 2012 | 1,143 × 1,200 (1.04 MB) | Cropbot (talk | contribs) | <!-- Uploaded with Cropbot operated by User:1Veertje --> {{Information |Description = - Peter Vandermeersch (NRC Handelsblad) - Marcel Gelauff (NOS Nieuws) - Frank Poorthuis (HP De Tijd) - Philip Remarque (de Volkskrant) verslag: http://www.denie... |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | Nokia |
---|---|
Camera model | N8-00 |
Exposure time | 1/15 sec (0.066666666666667) |
F-number | f/2.8 |
ISO speed rating | 100 |
Date and time of data generation | 17:38, 6 September 2011 |
Lens focal length | 5.8984375 mm |
Horizontal resolution | 240 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 240 dpi |
File change date and time | 07:30, 7 September 2011 |
Exif version | 2.2 |
Date and time of digitizing | 17:38, 6 September 2011 |
APEX shutter speed | 3.906891 |
APEX aperture | 2.970854 |
Light source | Unknown |
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 014 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 014 |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Digital zoom ratio | 0 |
Scene capture type | Standard |
Scene control | Low gain up |
Width | 4,000 px |
Height | 3,000 px |
Image width | 4,000 px |
Image height | 3,000 px |
Software used | Adobe Photoshop Lightroom |