Template talk:ODbL OpenStreetMap

Autotranslate

{{Editprotected}}

Please change the whole text to the following:

{{autotranslate|base=ODbL OpenStreetMap/i18n}}<includeonly>
{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|File|{{{category|[[Category:ODbL OpenStreetMap]]}}} }}</includeonly><noinclude>
{{Documentation}}
</noinclude>

Thanks, --Tacsipacsi (talk) 21:47, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

 Done --Jarekt (talk) 12:11, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Needs update

{{Editprotected}}

See Commons:Village_pump#ODbL_template_needs_update. --Palosirkka (talk) 10:37, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Please change the sentence:

The ODbL does not require any particular license for maps produced from ODbL data; map tiles produced by the OpenStreetMap foundation are licensed under the CC-BY-SA-2.0 licence, but maps produced by other people may be subject to other licences.

...to...

The ODbL does not require any particular license for maps produced from ODbL data. Prior to 1 August 2020, map tiles produced by the OpenStreetMap foundation were licensed under the CC-BY-SA-2.0 license. Maps produced by other people may be subject to other licences.

Nosferattus (talk) 01:15, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

@Nosferattus: Done. —Tacsipacsi (talk) 09:35, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Copyright symbol © and contributors word needs to be removed

{{Edit request}} The copyright symbol © before the word "OpenStreetMap Contributors" may hint users that the image has strict licensing requirements, where as the license just requires the words "contain map data from OpenStretmap with link to license". Suggest removing the copyright symbol and the word contributors. The suggested wording is "Contains information from OpenStreetMap, which is made available here under the Open Database License (ODbL)". Arjunaraoc (talk) 06:34, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

© does not mean "strict licensing requirements" Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 10:55, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Minor change, seems reasonable,  Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:04, 24 March 2022 (UTC)